SEBI should first regulate advisory at the AMC level

Slowly SEBI is waking up to the fact that members of the financial services have not bothered to take its advisor regulations seriously and that stern action is necessary. Instead of focussing on individuals, SEBI should first force the implementation of advisory regulations at the mutual fund AMC level.

SEBI has clearly laid out regulations that

1) People who offer investment advice will have to registered as investment advisers.

2) Distributors cannot offer investment advice. They can only offer ‘incidental advice’. Goal-based investing and risk profiling is not incidental advice. They better not be!!

3) People who are involved in multiple activities (such in mutual fund distributor and insurance agent) must get registered as investment advisers. They would also be known as registered investment advisers.

Yet, distributors and financials planners have by and large either ignored it or found a way to shift distribution to a family member (Indian jugaad is the best jugaad!).

They are able to ignore the regulator because, unless there is a complaint, SEBI will not and cannot take action upon anyone for not falling in line.

That said, SEBI is ignoring a much bigger and more influential issue.

Mutual fund companies while promoting their products, add:

Investors should consult their financial advisors if in doubt about whether the product is suitable for them.

The advisor they are referring to are distributors. However, distributors cannot provide investment advice.

So SEBI must force AMCs to change the line to

Investors should consult SEBI registered investment advisors if in doubt about whether the product is suitable for them.

SEBI must also prevent AMCs from conducting workshops or seminars for distributors which involves aspects of investment advisory and financial planning.

I believe this will increase the compliance rate in the services (by how much remains to be seen).

Parting shot: Financial advisors complain about free lunch and unwillingness to pay for advisory. When most 'advisors' fail to follow rules, what right do they have to complain about investors? Trust is essential for fees. Compliance and competence are essential for trust.

Related post: Who on Earth is a Financial Adviser?!


Register for the New Delhi DIY Investor meet:  April 23rd 2017

Get free, yet comprehensive calculators, tools and analysis delivered to your mailbox! Subscribe to get posts via email

Your subscription is successful if you are directed to the "Welcome Page"

Install Financial Freedom App! (Google Play Store)

Install Freefincal Retirement Planner App! (Google Play Store)


Buy our New Book!

You Can Be Rich With Goal-based Investing A book by  P V Subramanyam ( & M Pattabiraman. Read more about the book and pre-order now!
Practical advice + calculators for you to develop personalised investment solutions

About Freefincal

Freefincal has open-source, comprehensive Excel spreadsheets, tools, analysis and unbiased, conflict of interest-free commentary on different aspects of personal finance and investing. If you find the content useful, please consider supporting us by (1) sharing our articles and (2) disabling ad-blockers for our site if you are using one. We do not accept sponsored posts, links or guest posts request from content writers and agencies.

Blog Comment Policy

Your thoughts are vital to the health of this blog and are the driving force behind the analysis and calculators that you see here. We welcome criticism and differing opinions. I will do my very best to respond to all comments asap. Please do not include hyperlinks or email ids in the comment body. Such comments will be moderated and I reserve the right to delete  the entire comment or remove the links before approving them.

2 thoughts on “SEBI should first regulate advisory at the AMC level

Do let us know what you think about the article