Value Research admits: "Don't look for category toppers"

In the September 2015 issue of Mutual Fund Insight Value Research carried out an analysis of 20-year old mutual funds and admitted that one of the lessons is to not look for category toppers. This and other nuggets from that issue.

I had a lot of time to kill yesterday at the Bangalore airport after the DIY investor work and got hold of the latest Mutual Fund insight.

The cover story is, "Lessons from 20-year survivors". Five lessons were listed.

  1. Fund selection matters - which is nonsense as most of the duds were index funds and outright crappy funds which an sane person would have exited upon periodic review. As shown before and as discussed at the investor workshops, mutual fund selection does not matter. Disciplined investing combined with patience and a clearly defined review process is all that is needed. A well-defined selection process is also necessary, but there is no need act like it is rocket science (see below)
  2. More risk (in particular more of mid and small cap funds) does not guarantee more returns- agreed.

  3. "Don't look for category toppers. Look for benchmark beaters. None of the 20-year toppers were the top ranking funds in their categories year after year. In fact, they were only top-quartile or mid-quartile funds. But they did manage to consistently beat their benchmarks whether in good years or bad ones (not each year!)".


That is Value Research basically telling you not to look for top ranked funds! Or in other words, "do not chase 5-star funds". This is a point made here repeatedly:

Here is why you should ignore mutual fund star ratings

The Trouble With Mutual Fund Star Ratings

Part II: Here is why you should ignore mutual fund star ratings

4. Look for funds that do well in bear markets - Makes sense but not in they way they put it. I would prefer to focus on consistent downside protection.

"If your fund manager manages to keep up with the index in a bear market, be content with the returns .."
While that is indeed sane advice (and something I have gone through), the VR ratings system will automatically downgrade such funds, leading to a lot of confusion and debate - should I exit Top 200, HDFC Equity etc.

5. Funds with a clearly defined mandate are winners - no debate here.

Moral of the story: Use Value Research for data  and do your own analysis.

Fund selection criterion: Consistent performance (for a start) combined with consistent downside protection (when the investor understands the concept) is all that is required.

Here are some simple steps to build and review a mutual fund portfolio:

  1. Ignore star ratings

  2. Choose funds which have consistently beat the category average for the past 5+ years using the Automated Mutual Fund Screener  - a reasonable metric for consistency.

  3. If you are uncomfortable with equity, choose a single large cap fund, invest a sum and watch it fluctuate for a couple months on daily basis. Imagine what will happen with the investment amount gets larger with a visual aid if necessary: Visualizing the growth of an equity portfolio as a tilted pendulum

  4. Once you are comfortable, You can start a SIP, if you like. Unless we take losses into our stride and realize that they are necessary in order to gain, we cannot be successful equity investors.

  5. Then, after say 6-12 months, you can add one more fund, say a mid and small-cap fund - not more than 40% overall exposure.

  6. If you are not confident with fund selection, choose Turnkey mutual fund solutions to beat inflation

  7. Do not look at the fund performance for at least 3-5 years (the assumption here is that your goal is more than 10 years away).

  8. Then focus on the net return (XIRR) of your equity portfolio (that is both funds combined). Use that as a metric to figure out performance with respect to expectations. More on this here: How to review a mutual fund portfolio and here When should I exit an equity mutual fund?

Register for the Hyderabad DIY Investor Workshop Nov 27th 2016

Check out the latest mutual fund returns listing


Buy our New Book!

You Can Be Rich With Goal-based Investing A book by  P V Subramanyam ( & M Pattabiraman. Hard bound. Price: Rs. 399/- (Rs. 359/- at Read more about the book and pre-order now!
Practical advice + calculators for you to develop personalised investment solutions

Thank you for reading. You may also like

About Freefincal

Freefincal has open-source, comprehensive Excel spreadsheets, tools, analysis and unbiased, conflict of interest-free commentary on different aspects of personal finance and investing. If you find the content useful, please consider supporting us by (1) sharing our articles and (2) disabling ad-blockers for our site if you are using one. We do not accept sponsored posts, links or guest posts request from content writers and agencies.

Do more with freefincal!

Blog Comment Policy

Your thoughts are vital to the health of this blog and are the driving force behind the analysis and calculators that you see here. We welcome criticism and differing opinions. I will do my very best to respond to all comments asap. Please do not include hyperlinks or email ids in the comment body. Such comments will be moderated and I reserve the right to delete  the entire comment or remove the links before approving them.

15 thoughts on “Value Research admits: "Don't look for category toppers"

  1. Syamantak

    Bang on!! I hope now people, who promote DK as an expert analyst, would stop suggesting following the VRO ratings and picking up the best performers from there. 🙂

    1. vibhavshah

      i think, DK's contribution is there in spreading mf investment by providing online data for mfs for the first time in India. as far as ratings are concerned, it is given by others also and they have their own limitations. i remember, in one earlier post/article, the DK also guided to hold the fund, if it it falls in the first quartile.

  2. Anand

    Thanks Pattu! I liked the flow of this article and all your thoughts/analysis (in terms of your previous posts) seem to come back in 'compounded' manner. And the Moral of the story does really resonate.
    Earlier you had referred to a 'writer's block' - this one is a 'writer's compounder' 🙂

  3. IamNoSpecial

    I think, DK or somebody from his team himself said that the rankings are purely based on recent performance and should not be taken too seriously while analyzing a fund. Do not remember the exact words but carried similar meaning

  4. MRHDK2012

    Not sure why people are against DK. I thought he has been doing good job of analyzing mutual funds and educating people about it. He has been doing it for past 2 + decades. I have learnt a lot from his website and his own writings. I also find his views balanced and mostly unbiased.

    Am I missing anything?

  5. Aarati krishnan

    Well I wrote that article in MF Insight. If you read VR responses to reader queries we often ask people not to sell long term performers which have lost a star or two. So nothing to 'admit' really. Having said this do need a ready reckoner even to shortlist funds and the ratings do that well. It is lack of such benchmarking that makes ulips so difficult to select from.

    1. freefincal

      I dont think I need to tell you that a large section of mutual fund advisors and investors change funds based on your ranking system. VR projects the ratings as a decision-making tool which is irresponsible imo as decision making does not just involve fund selection. There is no need to use ratings as the benchmark for selection or review. The spread associated with each star is significant as I have shown earlier (links above)

      Ps. I enjoyed your article on using the right benchmarks for comparison. Will implement it in my risk-return calculator.


Do let us know what you think about the article