This composite case is built from patterns I see repeatedly in practice. Names and numbers are fictional. I show every calculation so you can check it and reuse the method. This is Part 2 of a four-part case study.
Read Part 1 here: Retirement Planning Case Study Part 1.
Read Part 2 here: Retirement Planning Case Study Part 2.
About the author: Ajay Pruthi is a fee-only SEBI-registered investment advisor. He can be contacted via his website plnr.in.
The story so far
🔥Secure your future with our Robo-advisory tool trusted by over 3,500 investors and advisors. From effortless retirement planning to funding your children’s biggest dreams, turn your financial goals into reality. 🔥
Subscribe for money management solutions via email! (Link takes you to our email sign-up form) Join 32,000+ readers in our community.
👉 New Tool Alert! NaviPlan: A Privacy-Focused Multi-asset Tracker and Goal Planner 👈
In Part 1, we found his FDs leaking about 40 lakhs to yearly tax and fixed it with two calm moves: savings into equity, FDs migrated to debt funds, reaching 50 with about 80 lakhs of cushion as a renter needing about 6 crores. In Part 2, his two clever ideas, a 1 crore equity shift and gifting the FDs to his parents, died on his untested nerves and his brother’s legal rights respectively, and we learnt his honest speed limit: freedom between 49 and 51.
All of that assumed he rents forever. He does not want to. Owning a house drops his lifetime need from about 6 crores to about 4.4 crores, because rent is the one expense with no ceiling. But the house can enter his life five different ways, and each carries a different price.
Scenario 7: I asked, do you own a house? He said no, and I want to buy one worth 1.5 crores. Verdict: a cash purchase nearly works with the equity layer, at the price of about one extra working year and full city certainty.
The full picture at 50: owning removes rent, so his need drops to about 4.4 crores. But after paying 1.5 crores, only 50 lakhs of old money remains, and even parked in debt funds at 6 percent it grows to only about 80 lakhs. EPF: 1.4 crores. Savings of 1.5 lakhs a month: about 1.85 crores if kept safe in debt funds, giving a total of about 4 crores, or about 2.2 crores in equity, giving about 4.4 crores.
Against the owner need of about 4.4 crores: the safe version is short by about 40 lakhs, and the equity version essentially touches the line with nothing to spare. So the cash purchase works only with the equity layer, and even then retirement realistically lands at 50 with zero cushion or at 51 with a small one.
Verdict: not a no, a price tag. This house costs him roughly one extra working year of comfort, and it makes sense only if he is certain which city his life from 50 to 90 happens in. A single 42-year-old who may yet change cities should not lock three-quarters of his liquid wealth into one address. And whatever happens, the parents medical fund is carved out before any builder is paid.
Scenario 8: He asked, what if I buy the same house with a loan and keep my FDs? Verdict: rejected; he would pay the bank 8.5 percent so his own money can earn 4.2 to 6.
The full picture: 50 lakhs down from the FDs, 1 crore borrowed at 8.5 percent for 10 years. The EMI is about 1.24 lakhs a month, leaving only about 26,000 of his 1.5 lakhs of savings. Over 8 years he pays about 46 lakhs of interest, while his retained 1.5 crores of safe money earns about 6 percent in debt funds, and only 4.2 if left in FDs, in possibly the same bank he is borrowing from at 8.5. At 50 the loan still has about 27 lakhs outstanding, and his corpus lands near 3.8 crores against the owner need of about 4.4 crores, short by about 60 lakhs.
Verdict: rejected without much discussion. Borrowing at 8.5 percent so your own money can earn 4.2 to 6 makes the bank rich twice. A loan makes sense when your money reliably earns more than the loan costs; his safe money cannot, and we have agreed his temperament is not yet ready to bet the difference on equity.
Scenario 9: I asked, are you sure which city you will grow old in? He said not fully. Verdict: then rent now and buy at 50 in the chosen city; it costs roughly one to two extra working years for that certainty.
The full picture: he runs the Scenario 3 combination for eight years, reaching about 6.8 crores at 50. The same 1.5 crore house, at 6.5 percent property inflation, costs about 2.5 crores by then. Buying it at 50 leaves about 4.3 crores against the owner need of about 4.4 crores, short by roughly 15 lakhs, which means retiring around 51 instead.
Verdict: waiting is costlier than it looks, because the house price grows on the full amount while his safe money grows slower after tax. But this scenario buys the one thing no spreadsheet prices: at 50 he purchases in the city he has actually chosen to grow old in. If today’s city is uncertain, roughly one extra working year is the honest price of keeping that choice open. Sometimes certainty is worth a year.
Scenario 10: I asked, do your parents own a house that will come to you? If yes and he would live in it, this is the most comfortable outcome in the whole file; he may never need to buy at all.
One intake question rewrites the whole housing chapter: what do the parents own? If they have a house he will inherit, in a city he would retire in, he may never need to buy at all. The plan becomes: rent while working, inherit, retire into the family home. His rent years become limited instead of lifelong, so his true need falls somewhere between the owner’s 4.4 and the renter’s 6 crores, and his Scenario 3 corpus of about 6.8 crores covers it with genuine room to spare, the most comfortable outcome in this entire file.
Three gates before trusting it: is there a will and are there siblings, because an inherited house shared with a brother is not a home, it is a negotiation, and he does have a brother; what condition is the house in, because an old parental house can need 30 or 40 lakhs of repairs, a real cost but far smaller than 1.5 crores; and would he actually live there, because some people cannot live in the house their parents died in, and no plan should assume his answer.
Scenario 11: I asked, would you actually live in your parents’ house? He said I may sell it and buy a better one, about 80 lakhs costlier. Verdict: nearly tax-free under Section 54; keep about 1 crore flexible for an unknown date.
Two things to know. First, the tax law is kind to exactly this move: sell an inherited house and put the entire gain into a new residential house within the allowed time, and the capital gains tax is fully exempt under Section 54; since his new house costs more than the old one sells for, the whole gain is absorbed and tax is nearly nil. Second, his true housing cost in this scenario is neither 1.5 crores nor zero: it is the 80 lakhs difference, plus stamp duty on the full new price and interiors, call it about 1 crore, arriving on an unknown date, because nobody knows when an inheritance happens.
For an unknown date the answer is a flexible pot: about 1 crore of the corpus kept in FD ladders and short-duration debt funds, reachable within weeks whether the moment comes at 51 or 63. Note how this quietly argues against Scenario 5 once more: money that must stay flexible cannot sit locked in anyone else’s name. And because his brother exists, the sale itself needs the succession paperwork clean: a registered will, or the brother’s signature at the registrar.
Where we stand at the end of Part 3
Five doors, and notice that not one of them was free. Cash now costs a working year and demands city certainty. The loan pays the bank twice and was rejected. Buying at 50 costs a year but buys the right city. The inherited house is the most comfortable outcome in the entire file, if a will, a brother’s signature and his own heart allow it. And the sell-and-upgrade route is nearly tax-free but needs about 1 crore kept flexible for a date nobody can know.
Part 4 turns to the questions that outrank every rupee so far: what if his parents cannot get health insurance at all, what happens to every number on this page if he marries, and the surprising answer to whether a man with dependent parents needs term insurance. Then, finally, you choose.