Last Updated on August 11, 2025 at 10:21 am
In Oct 2022, the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA), the NPS regulator, released a draft proposal on implementing Systematic Lump sum Withdrawal (SLW) in the national pension scheme and sought public feedback. We had earlier discussed the withdrawal rules, the proposed change and our feedback on the same: NPS Systematic Lump Sum Withdrawal Rules Explained.
The Hindu BusinessLine recently quoted the PFRDA chairman that systematic withdrawal will be available from this calendar year. A discussion on what is proposed, what retirees should be aware of and how (when) they can benefit.
What are the existing NPS withdrawal rules, and where does this proposal fit?
Existing rules: After the age of 60, an NPS subscriber has the following options:
🔥Secure your future with our Robo-advisory tool trusted by over 3,500 investors and advisors. From effortless retirement planning to funding your children’s biggest dreams, turn your financial goals into reality. 🔥
Subscribe for money management solutions via email! (Link takes you to our email sign-up form) Join 32,000+ readers in our community.
👉 New Tool Alert! NaviPlan: A Privacy-Focused Multi-asset Tracker and Goal Planner 👈
Option 1: Normal exit. Here the subscriber has to buy an annuity for at least 40% of the accumulated corpus, and the rest can be withdrawn free of tax in one shot.
Options 2: Extend the time of withdrawal to age 70. The subscriber can continue to invest normally and get tax benefits as usual. This is a smart choice for those who do not need the NPS corpus immediately. An annuity purchased at age 70 will offer a higher interest rate. Also, the total taxable income at age 70 may be lower for some people. See: What are the annuity rates of LIC Jeevan Akshay VII from Feb 2022?
Option 3: This option has different choices, but no further contributions are allowed.
- Choice 1: Defer lump sum payout by max ten years and annuity payout by three years. After this period, the annuity must be purchased and the lump sum withdrawn.
- Choice 2: Defer only annuity (max three years) or only lump sum payout (max ten years). After this period, the annuity must be purchased and the lump sum withdrawn.
- Choice 3: Phased withdrawal of lump-sum amounts to 70 with a minimum withdrawal of 10% each year. The catch here, the annuity will have to be purchased immediately.
Note: Please consult this guide on implementing these choices: How to withdraw from NPS by optimising tax and market fluctuations after 60.
What is the problem? As per existing rules, for annual withdrawals, “the subscriber
has to initiate the withdrawal request each time, and the request has to be authorized as the case may be,” says the PFRDA draft proposal.
Proposed rule to option 3 and choice 3: PFRDA proposes that the lump sum can be paid systematically on a periodical basis viz monthly, quarterly, half-yearly or annually for a period until the age of 75 in an automated manner with a one-time request. This will apply to both Tier I and II.
Note: The annuity clause (min 40%) is still mandatory. This Systematic Lump
sum Withdrawal (SLW) is only applicable to amount not annuitized. That is the SLW will be applicable only for the lump sum portion. Subscriber can either opt for annuity immediately or defer annuity till 75 years
- No further contributions are allowed in Tier I (allowed in Tier II)
- Partial withdrawal won’t be allowed post-setting up of SLW
- Since Tier II withdrawals are not linked to age, the SLW can be set up anytime.
- During SLW, subscribers can opt for scheme Preference or pension fund manager change. However, it will be applicable only for the lump sum portion. If not already withdrawn, the annuity portion will remain as per the existing scheme choice only, and no changes can be made.
- The lump sum withdrawal (max 60%) is tax-free, and so is the SLW.
- Please bear in mind that the corpus is still market linked. Therfore depending on the market conditions, the corpus may deplete faster because of the continuous withdrawals.
- It would be better for PFRDA to introduce a separate money-market asset class for the retiree to shift a portion of the lump sum and initial systematic withdrawals from that cash component.
- The PFRDA’s claim (in the above quoted article), “You get higher return and redeem as you go” may not always pan out to be true.
- It is not clear as of now if government emmployees will be allowed the SLW option.
Retirees who can afford to keep the lump sum in the NPS and gradually withdraw it can opt for the SLW. “Afford” here means the retirees have “enough” assest elsewhere and their reliance on the NPS corpus is not high.
The proposed clause, “Partial withdrawal won’t be allowed post-setting up of SLW”, is quite restrive. That said, the SLW is a step in the right direction. It is most useful for retirees who have saved up a large enough corpus to leave the money in NPS and save on tax.
If they had to withdraw the lump sum (which is tax free) and invest it elsewhere, there is a tax incidence upon that withdrawal. With NPS SLW, one can withdraw as necessary and pay no tax. However, this luxury is possible when one has enough liquid assets elsewhere.
In summary, the NPS systematic withdrawl facility can certainly useful to financially independent retirees. However it would be best done from a money market like asset pool instead of long term gilt or corporate bonds (classes G or C). If this remains unchanged retirees must be educated that such systematic withdrawals can be risky as long-term bonds are volatile. Any extended period of poor returns can result in faster depletion of the NPS corpus. So ample precautions are necessary.