Tracking the growth of my 16-year NPS portfolio

Published: July 22, 2026 at 6:00 am

I have invested in the National Pension Scheme (NPS) since 8 March 2010. This is a performance report showing how the NPS has fared over the last 16+ years. We also compare the returns with the EPF.

Note 1: Kindly do not assume that I am recommending NPS instruments. My situation is quite different from most. NPS is a mandatory investment for me. The asset allocation is like a conservative hybrid fund – up to 25% equity, up to 65% gilts,  up to 45% in other bonds, up to 10% in short-term bonds, up to 5% in asset-based, trust-structured assets like pooled debt, REITs, etc.

If you are in a corporate setup, please recognise that NPS has a lock-in of up to 60. Most corporate employees will not work until that age. If you exit before 60, 80% of your corpus will be locked into an annuity. So, our recommendation has always been not to invest in NPS.

If your employer is contributing to the NPS by reducing your take-home pay for that “instant 30% tax benefit”, then at least make sure the EPF and NPS are not your primary retirement instruments!

Note 2: We now publish a monthly National Pension Scheme Fund Screener to shortlist consistently performing NPS schemes.

🔥Secure your future with our Robo-advisory tool trusted by over 3,500 investors and advisors. From effortless retirement planning to funding your children’s biggest dreams,  turn your financial goals into reality. 🔥

Subscribe for money management solutions via email! (Link takes you to our email sign-up form) Join 32,000+ readers in our community.

I have been part of the NPS since 2006. However, the NPS was not ready for investment at the time. Until then, the organisation F&A held the money with 8% annual interest. The first investment into NPS funds was made on 8th March 2010.

We shall track the progress from that date. The money was almost equally divided among the three Tier 1 (central govt) schemes offered by UTI, LIC and SBI.

With employer contributions, NPS is one of the best step-up SIPs in mutual funds. My monthly investment today is 6.68 times more than my 2010 investment. That is a 12.33% year-on-year increase in investment. You can see that in the curvature of the total investment line below.

This is the growth of the NPS portfolio along with total investments. The XIRR as of 17th July 2026 is 8.54%. It has decreased a bit over time.

Normalised growth of my NPS investments from Mar 2010 to July 2026
Normalised growth of my NPS investments from Mar 2010 to July 2026

In July 2013, the RBI increased the overnight rate by 2% to stem the fall of the Rupee. My gilt-heavy NPS portfolio took a mighty tumble.  This is what the NAV looked like in Oct 2013. My NPS CAGR just before the fall was 11-ish%; overnight, it became 6-ish%, then recovered over the next few months. When this occurred, PFRDA realised, “Aisa bhi hota hai! What if this happens just before the person retires?!” and introduced staggered withdrawals.

NPS-central-government-schemes-performance
NPS-central-government-schemes-performance

Annotated gain in the NPS portfolio.

Total gain my NPS portfolio from March 2010 to July 2026

Total gain in my NPS portfolio from March 2010 to July 2026

NPS (Default Central Govt Scheme)  vs EPF

This compares the NPS NAV (the SBI central govt fund has been used as a representative) and the EPF NAV (constructed from annual interest rate history).

Growth of NPS Central Govt Scheme vs EPF from March 2010 to July 2026
Growth of NPS Central Govt Scheme vs EPF from March 2010 to July 2026

At the time of writing, NPS has outperformed EPF, but that may not always be true! If I had invested in EPF instead of NPS ten years ago, the NAV evolution (assuming daily growth = annual interest/365) would look like this.

Imaginary growth of EPF investment from March 2010 to July 2026
Imaginary growth of EPF investment from March 2010 to July 2026

It is hard to beat the non-volatile growth of EPF, but it is not too shabby for a mandatory investment! The asset allocation of central govt employees can now be modified. I have not changed it (and recommend others not to either). Using NPS as a debt-oriented conservative-hybrid fund and managing equity separately works well for me

Also, see: