Last Updated on December 18, 2021 at 10:54 pm
“Schools suck, the system sucks, everyone sucks”. Sounds familiar? You may have probably said at some point in your life – perhaps as a parent, perhaps as a student and perhaps as a teacher!! A discussion on why homeschooling is essential for every child, whether they go to school or not!
Before we begin, a quick clarification that I am not suggesting that a school education is not necessary, that we should get out kids out of that system and begin teaching them at home. It would be silly to offer such generic advice. I am only suggesting that homeschooling is essential for every child because regular schooling is not sufficient.
What is homeschooling?
The usual definition is schooling at home by a parent or tutor without enrollment in an educational institution. For the purposes of this post, it shall mean
schooling at home by both parents in addition to their formal school education.
Yes, that may sound at first sight as a lot of work to be done by the kids, but please bear with me.
🔥Secure your future with our Robo-advisory tool trusted by over 3,500 investors and advisors. From effortless retirement planning to funding your children’s biggest dreams, turn your financial goals into reality. 🔥
Subscribe for money management solutions via email! (Link takes you to our email sign-up form) Join 32,000+ readers in our community.
👉 New Tool Alert! NaviPlan: A Privacy-Focused Multi-asset Tracker and Goal Planner 👈
Why do schools suck?
Long story short, because they have forgotten that kids comes first – no matter what. So much that they do even know who is at fault. Teachers blame the management. The management blames the parents, the parents blame the school and kids blame everybody (including themselves)!
School Syllabi are a load of crap!
Our system cannot differentiate between a concept and mere information. The role of a teacher is to discuss (not teach) concepts – the what, the how and most importantly the why of a certain idea.
Then assign each kid in class to work on an example: how each concept applies to real life and discuss it in class. As a class they would cover a lot of ground that way.
Then in the exam, quiz on how the concept can be applied to hypothetical and real-life situations.
It is as simple as that. A syllabus should be a simple list of 3-4 concepts to be discussed over a year, one a month. Instead, our syllabi read like a short story.
Most teachers in the system confuse the example (which is just information) with the underlying concept (or rather why one should study it). As a result, the students are unable to convince themselves that it is a good idea to know more.
I hope the above makes some kind of sense. This confusing, unconvinced mindset propagates from class to class and gets worse.
The syllabi has to be a lot smaller urging the teacher and student to find applications on their own. That would make it a lot more fun.
1 Homeschooling is essential for the kids to understand the framework of the subject. We give them the bare bones, sit with them while the develop the skeleton with it and then leave them alone to cover it with flesh and fashion it the way they want.
The Syllabi covers a lot of unnecessary stuff!
Even if we think in terms of concepts/ideas alone, our kids are asked to read too much. As a graduate and post-graduate teacher, I can tell you with certainty that the entire 12th standard portions should be scrapped. They should cut up the 11th standard book into two and then teach the second half in 12th standard. A similar exercise is also possible with lower class.
No. I am not suggesting we teach them financial literacy and the need to beat inflation. That is just plain immature.
Most concepts in 10th, 11th and 12th standards (or even lower classes) need to learnt only in college. Simply because a school student does have the background necessary to learn them. Since we force it on them young, they end up with wrong notions. Once they go to college, they first need to unlearn the crap learnt in school and learn it back the right way … if they are still interested!
2 We cannot control what they learn in school, but with homeschooling, we can urge them dig deeper and learn a concept the right way the first time around.
Schools are partial to “good students”
Not everyone in a class learn at the same pace. Each time I stand before a new class, I make it clear that my job as a teacher is not to cater to the intelligent kids – who do not need help. Not to cater to the uninterested kids – who will nor respond anyway. My job is quite simple – help interested kids who need some time and effort to learn.
School teachers are always in a hurry! They want to finish the syllabus so that they can conducts exams and do not give enough time for the entire class to get to the same page (literally!). They tend to be partial to intelligent kids (this is human nature) and some even tell the slow learners that they not good enough (this is a crime!).
3 Homeschooling is essential for slow learners to catch up (if they want to go to a regular school)
Should we send our kids to school at all?
Given how bad a formal school education can be, is it worth it all? Why not simply homeschool them at their pace (and ours!).
Schools certainly play a very important part in preparing kids for the shitty real world out there. They need to get used to crappy environments (with our support) otherwise, they may not be able to adopt later!
Not everything about a school is bad. We are social creatures and like to make friends. We interact with different cultures and learn. Some of the best bonds in life are made at school. They learn the importance of working in a group as a group and for a group.
4 Homeschooling is essential to hone their individuality. Formal schooling is essential to make that individuality cope in a real-world situation.
If schools have cons, they have pros too. If homeschooling has pros it has cons too. If not every school teacher is competent, not every homeschool teacher(parent/tutor) is competent. Choosing just one be dangerous! Even this requires diversification. We need both.