DHFL Crisis: Did UTI Mutual Fund act in the interest of investors?

Published: June 29, 2019 at 10:30 am

Last Updated on

The way UTI Mutual fund handled the DHFL crisis leaves a lot to be desired to say the least highlighting the need for tighter rules on what an AMC should do in the case of a bond default.  In early June 2019,  Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd a housing finance company defaulted on almost 1000 Crores of interest payment. If you are affected, you can refer to my earlier article: DHFL Crisis: How to handle your debt mutual funds now?

This criticism of UTI Mutual Fund is the author’s personal opinion and does not in any way imply that the author feels other AMC’s handled the DHFL crisis better! Good or bad is absolute and not a relative measure.

According to livemint, as many as 165 mutual funds (24 AMCs) had exposure to DHFL totalling 5336 crores. If I go by negative monthly returns listed at Value Research as many as 22 funds with a combined AUM of almost 1700 Crores (as on May 31 st 2019) has been affected by DHFL defaults. Fifteen of these funds are FMP/interval funds.

DHFL Crisis: Did UTI Mutual Fund act in the interest of investors?

Among these, UTI Credit Risk Fund has the largest AUM of ~ 4400 Crores. UTI Ultra Short Term Fund (~ 3790 Cr), UTI Treasury Advantage Fund (~ 3000 Crores) and UTI Short Term Income Fund (~ 2700 Cr) are also others affected with significant AUM.

Let us track the AUM of UTI short term income fund along with its DHFL exposure from the fund house factsheets. AUM refers to month closing AUM.

  • Aug 31st 2018, AUM: 9572.7 Crores, DHFL exposure: 4.53%, CARE AAA
  • Nov 30st 2018, AUM:  8590.57Crores, DHFL exposure: 4.49%, CARE AAA
  • Feb 28 2019, AUM: 5545.55 Crores, DHFL exposure: 6.47%,  CARE AA+
  • Mar 31st 2019, AUM: 4366.46 Crores, DHFL exposure: 8.28%, CARE AA-
  • April 30 2019, AUM: 4219.58 Crores, DHFL exposure: 8.39%, CARE A
  • May 31st 2019, AUM: 2784.80 Crores, DHFL exposure: 11.65%, CARE BBB-

Notice that the AUM has been going down progressively. It is this because of institutional investor pull out? Recall DHFL shares dropped 42% on bond default fears in Sep 2018. Is this the reason for the big fall in AUM of the fund from Nov 2018 to Feb 2018?

We are quick to criticize rating agencies but they did progressively degrade the bond (although not fast enough). The fund manager had enough red flags and enough time to sell at least partial holding when the rating was above AA.

The DHFL exposure kept increasing because the fund manager could not sell, but is the situation so bad that AA+, AA- rated bonds cannot be traded!! If you tell me that it is not possible to trade a AA rated bond (in India, in large quantities) then it makes no sense for an investor to buy any kind of debt mutual fund! (gilts have reasonable liquidity, but even gilt funds and money market funds buy corporate bonds and they can get into this kind trouble. You will have dig a bit for relatively safer alternatives such as this: SBI Magnum Constant Maturity Fund: A Debt Fund With Low Credit Risk for long term goals!)

Notice the big fall in AUM from April to May. Again institutional pull out leaving retail investors to face the music of 11% exposure?

It is time SEBI monitored such big drops in AUMs and demanded an explanation from  AMCs. At the very least it will attract some media attention and warn retail investors.

Ideally, such a large fall in AUM with 10%+ exposure due to an inability to sell should trigger scheme closure wrt further purchase, but that is a bit too much to ask. At least UTI mutual fund could have side-pocketed the bad debt to assuage unitholders.

Hate ads but would like to support the site? Subscribe to our ad-free newsletter and get beautifully formatted full articles delivered to your inbox!

Side-pocketing refers to partitioning the scheme assets into two: The good assets with a good NAV that investors can buy and sell from and bad assets that is locked until it is known one way or another.

They did not modify the scheme wordings to include this provision before the default, but that matters little. If they side-pocketed, neither SEBI nor the unitholders would have complained.

DId UTI has avoided side-pocketing because it is an invitation to exit resulting in significant loss of AUM and profits? Even after the pre-crisis fall, the AUM is still significant (quite likely the highest combined AUM of all AMCs affected).  Others AMCs are also guilty (IMO) of not choosing to side-pocket, but some like BNP Paribas stopped inflows temporarily. Tata MF and DHFL Pramerica have implemented implement side-pocketing.

One could argue that since the DHFL exposure has been marked to zero, side-pocketing does not matter much. I disagree.  Side-pocketing is important as it does not offer an unfair opportunity to new investors to profit if the money is paid back by the borrower.

Suppose I was an investor as on June 2019 and saw the NAV drop by ~ 11% and wondering whether to stay put or not. Then you see the lower NAV as an opportunity to invest and by some stroke of luck DHFL repays its debt, you would get a spectacular return and I would still get a terrible return due to the fact the NAV was down for a few days/weeks/months.

So side-pocketing protects existing unitholders as inflows and outflows can stem only from the good assets in the fund. Even if this is not done, at the very least fresh inflows should have been stopped to prevent the above scenario.

UTI MF neither side-pocketed nor stopped fresh inflows. It imposed a 2-3% exit load for investments made after June 7 and redeemed before 3-6 months. Even after paying the exit load new investor could make significant gains if DHFL pays back.

This possibility, however remote, is not in the interest of existing unitholders.  In my insignificant opinion, UTI MF has handled this DHFL crisis right from its share price crash in a terrible manner. SEBI should have intervened and forced side-pocketing by all AMCs. Let us hope it at least makes it mandatory for future defaults.

Mutual funds are subject to management risks ….. sahi hai

Do share if you found this useful
Hate ads but would like to support the site? Subscribe to our ad-free newsletter and get beautifully formatted full articles delivered to your inbox!

About the Author

M Pattabiraman author of freefincal.comM. Pattabiraman(PhD) is the founder, managing editor and primary author of freefincal. He is an associate professor at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. since Aug 2006. Connect with him via Linkedin
Pattabiraman has co-authored two print-books, You can be rich too with goal-based investing (CNBC TV18) and Gamechanger and seven other free e-books on various topics of money management.  He is a patron and co-founder of “Fee-only India” an organisation to promote unbiased, commission-free investment advice.
He conducts free money management sessions for corporates and associations on the basis of money management. Previous engagements include World Bank, RBI, BHEL, Asian Paints, TamilNadu Investors Association etc. For speaking engagements write to pattu [at] freefincal [dot] com

About freefincal & Content Policy

Freefincal is a News Media Organization dedicated to providing original analysis, reports, reviews and insights on developments in mutual funds, stocks, investing, retirement and personal finance. We do so without conflict of interest and bias. We operate in a non-profit manner. All revenue is used only for expenses and for the future growth of the site.
Freefincal serves more than one million readers a year (2.5 million page views) with articles based only on factual information and detailed analysis by its authors. All statements made will be verified from credible and knowledgeable sources before publication. Freefincal does not publish any kind of paid articles, promotions or PR, satire or opinions without data. All opinions presented will only be inferences backed by verifiable, reproducible evidence/data. Contact information: letters {at} freefincal {dot} com (sponsored posts or paid collaborations will not be entertained)

Connect with us on social media

Our Publications


You Can Be Rich Too with Goal-Based Investing

You can be rich too with goal based investingMy first book is meant to help you ask the right questions, seek the right answers and since it comes with nine online calculators, you can also create custom solutions for your lifestyle! Get it now.  It is also available in Kindle format.
Gamechanger: Forget Startups, Join Corporate & Still Live the Rich Life You WantGamechanger: Forget Start-ups, Join Corporate and Still Live the Rich Life you wantMy second book is meant for young earners to get their basics right from day one! It will also help you travel to exotic places at low cost! Get it or gift it to a young earner

The ultimate guide to travel by Pranav Surya

Travel-Training-Kit-Cover This is a deep dive analysis into vacation planning, finding cheap flights, budget accommodation, what to do when travelling, how travelling slowly is better financially and psychologically with links to the web pages and hand-holding at every step.  Get the pdf for ₹199 (instant download)  

Free Apps for your Android Phone

All calculators from our book, “You can be Rich Too” are now available on Google Play!
Install Financial Freedom App! (Google Play Store)
Install Freefincal Retirement Planner App! (Google Play Store)
Find out if you have enough to say "FU" to your employer (Google Play Store)

Comment Policy

Your thoughts are the driving force behind our work. We welcome criticism and differing opinions.Please do not include hyperlinks or email ids in the comment body. Such comments will be moderated and I reserve the right to delete the entire comment or remove the links before approving them.

11 Comments

  1. SEBI should enforce compulsory sidepocketing of the mutual fund holding in case of defaults/if the holding exceeds 10% due to redemption pressure.

  2. This compels us to create an AUM & rating tracker of sorts to safeguard against such crisis. Is this possible to create?

  3. Tata MF side pocketed DHF in Tata treasury management but didn’t in Tata short term Bond fund for IL&FS. Why the same fund is dealing with similar problem in different ways?

  4. Instituional investors always get the advantage when it comes to exiting such crap MF. Retail investors are left with the mess and a beggar bowl. SEBI should do something else retail investors will loose faith in the system that favours institutional investors over retail. Now thinking of overnight debt funds at 6% its better than loosing money like share market in debt mutual funds.

  5. Before the SEBI mandated changes in 2018, UTI Ultra Short Term Fund was a “Floating rate” fund. Such funds are more useful when the interest rates are expected to rise. Interest rate peaked last in September 2018 and has been on a steady course of decline since then. May be, one reason (or rather two) for investors pulling out was the SEBI mandated change in the basic attribute of this fund, coupled with the steady decline in the interest rate. What do you think, Pattu sir?

  6. IN THE 1ST WEEK OF JUNE,2019 UTI MF HAS DAMEGED BRUTALLY THE PRICIPAL MONEY OF INVESTORS PERTICULARLY LARGE NUMBER OF MIDDLE CLASS PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY WHO HAVE BEEN INVESTING IN TREASURY ADVANTAGE FUND & SOME OTHER DEBT FUNDS JUST CONSEDERING IT A VERY LOW RISK FUND.
    IT SEEMS THAT THERE IS NONE IN THIS COUNTRY TO TAKE STERN ACTION AGAINST UTI MF WHO ARBITRRILY & DICTATORIALLY TAKE DECISION TO HUSELY SLASH NAV OF TREASURY ADVANTAGE FUND & SOME OTHER DEBT FUNDS.

    MY OPINIAN IS THAT ALL CONCERNED PERSONS OF UTI MANAGEMENT & SOME AUTHORITIES OF SEBI & OTHERS WHO ARE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS MINACE, MUST BE SEVERLY PUNISHED. AFTER ALL, WHAT WERE THEY DOING WHEN DHFL CRSIS STARTED IN LATTER PART OF THE YEAR 2018. IT SEEMS THAT THEY ALL ARE IN CONNIVANCE OF FOUL PLAY OF UTI MF TO CONTINUE THE ASSOCIATION WITH DHFL. UTI HAS BEEN KEEPING ALL INVESTORS IN DOLDRUM.

    WHY IS GOVERNMENT OF SRI NARENDRA MODI SILENT OVER THIS DEFOLCATION? WHY PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY ARE BEING CHEATED BY FUND HOUSES UNDER THE NOSE OF THE POPULAR GOVERNMENT

  7. The consistent fall in AUM of UTI Treasury Advantage Fund after IL&FS crisis situation is possibly a case of large investors having prior information cashing out while the ever obliging fund manager opted to turn his back.

    This will continue to happen as there is large scale manipulation by AMC’s and SEBI is toothless from investor perspective. Except for political instructions, they compound offences by charging penalty fees and build their treasury.

    Your article hits the nail on its head. Are we (as investor community) going to just accept these manipulations or there is somebody who will listen to the woes of small investor and act against the manipulators? Or the cartel will continue their bad ways to fleece the unsuspecting people who fall for the carrot in greed of few percentage higher returns.

    Is there a platform or an association of unit holders who can at least make public the wrong doings of the AMC’s?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *