We review the performance consistency of SBI Pension Fund Scheme E – NPS TIER I measured against Nifty 50 TRI and UTI Nifty 50 TRI. The scheme was launched in June 2009 and currently has an AUM of little over Rs. nine thousand crores. Only the scheme from HDFC Pension has a higher AUM (in the E segment for non-govt. subscribers).
In a previous article, we listed the investment policy of NPS equity schemes, which behave like actively managed large and mid cap funds: Is the NPS Equity Scheme an index fund?
Therefore it is right to determine how often these funds outperform their benchmarks (BSE 100 or BSE 200). The Nifty 50 is an equivalent accessible benchmark.
Disclaimer: Fund performance reports present return and risk analysis of a fund with representative benchmarks and not investment recommendations. It must be expressly understood that the data below reflect only past performance and is in no way an indication of future performance.
We shall use the Rolling return outperformance consistency to gauge performance. The fund returns are compared with category benchmark returns over every possible 1Y,2Y,3Y,4Y, and 5Y period. Higher the outperformance consistency, the better. Suppose 876 fund returns were compared with 876 benchmark returns, and the fund has beaten the benchmark 675 times. The consistency score will be 675/876 ~ 77%. All data are as of 29th August 2022.
🔥Secure your future with our Robo-advisory tool trusted by over 3,500 investors and advisors. From effortless retirement planning to funding your children’s biggest dreams, turn your financial goals into reality. 🔥
Subscribe for money management solutions via email! (Link takes you to our email sign-up form) Join 32,000+ readers in our community.
👉 New Tool Alert! NaviPlan: A Privacy-Focused Multi-asset Tracker and Goal Planner 👈
SBI Pension Fund Scheme E – NPS TIER I vs Nifty 50 TRI
One year
| Metric | Nifty 50 TRI |
| No of rolling return entries Index (1 Year) | 3417 |
| No of rolling return entries Fund (1 year) | 3417 |
| No of times fund outperformed index (1 year) | 1082 |
| rolling return outperformance Consistency Score (1 year) | 32% |
Two years
| Metric | Nifty 50 TRI |
| No of rolling return entries Index (2 Years) | 2935 |
| No of rolling return entries Fund (2 years) | 2935 |
| No of times fund outperformed the index (2 years) | 1178 |
| rolling return outperformance Consistency Score (2 years) | 40% |
Three years
| Metric | Nifty 50 TRI |
| No of rolling return entries Index (3 Years) | 2532 |
| No of rolling return entries Fund (3 years) | 2532 |
| No of times fund has outperformed the index (3 years) | 1198 |
| rolling return outperformance Consistency Score (3 years) | 47% |
Four years
| Metric | Nifty 50 TRI |
| No of rolling return entries Index (4 Years) | 2288 |
| No of rolling return entries Fund (4 years) | 2288 |
| No of times fund has outperformed the index (4 years) | 953 |
| rolling return outperformance Consistency Score (4 years) | 42% |
Five years
| Metric | Nifty 50 TRI |
| No of rolling return entries Index (5 Years) | 2038 |
| No of rolling return entries Fund (5 years) | 2038 |
| No of times fund has outperformed the index (5 years) | 753 |
| rolling return outperformance Consistency Score (5 years) | 37% |
Unfortunately, that is a poor performance for a non-index that wants to “maximise returns”.
SBI Pension Fund Scheme E – NPS TIER I vs UTI Nifty 50 TRI
We repeat the above exercise with UTI Nifty 50 TRI direct plan growth option.
One year
| Fund | UTI Nifty 50 |
| No of rolling return entries Index (1 Year) | 3156 |
| No of rolling return entries Fund (1 year) | 3156 |
| No of times fund has outperformed the index (1 year) | 1950 |
| rolling return outperformance Consistency Score (1 year) | 62% |
Two years
| Fund | UTI Nifty 50 |
| No of rolling return entries Index (2 Years) | 2433 |
| No of rolling return entries Fund (2 years) | 2433 |
| No of times fund outperformed the index (2 years) | 1372 |
| rolling return outperformance Consistency Score (2 years) | 56% |
Three years
| Fund | UTI Nifty 50 |
| No of rolling return entries Index (3 Years) | 1792 |
| No of rolling return entries Fund (3 years) | 1792 |
| No of times fund outperformed the index (3 years) | 792 |
| rolling return outperformance Consistency Score (3 years) | 44% |
Four years
| Fund | UTI Nifty 50 |
| No of rolling return entries Index (4 Years) | 1396 |
| No of rolling return entries Fund (4 years) | 1396 |
| No of times fund outperformed the index (4 years) | 478 |
| rolling return outperformance Consistency Score (4 years) | 34% |
Five years
| Fund | UTI Nifty 50 |
| No of rolling return entries Index (5 Years) | 1147 |
| No of rolling return entries Fund (5 years) | 1147 |
| No of times fund has outperformed the index (5 years) | 275 |
| rolling return outperformance Consistency Score (5 years) | 24% |
Again, that is rather poor. These results reiterate our recommendation to avoid equity (scheme E) in your NPS portfolio! Unless your employer contributes to the NPS and you have a permanent job, it makes little sense to invest in the NPS. See: Stay away from Corporate NPS if You Wish to Retire ASAP!