Are you a conservative investor? Here is how you can grow your money smartly

Last Updated on

Would you as a money manager, prefer to get the basics right and get on with your life? That is, do enough to ensure that you have more than a reasonable chance of achieving your future money-dependent goals/dreams and focus on your work, family and hobbies? If yes, in this guest post, SEBI registered fee-only investment advisor Swapnil Kendhe discusses simple and practical ways to grow your money smartly.

Swapnil Kendhe as readers may be aware is part of my List of Fee-only Financial Planners in India and Fee-only India: launch of a movement to serve investors and advisors. You can read more about his story here:

Fee-only advisor journey: Swapnil Kendhe’s successful transition into a SEBI RIA

Swapnil is one of the most ethical financial advisors that I am proud to be associated with. Since he has a strong desire to understand and manage portfolio risk, our wavelengths match. If you are looking for an affordable, honest and unbiased financial advisor to set your money matters in order, you can contact him via his website: VivektaruNow over to him.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

In his investment classic ‘The Intelligent Investor’, Benjamin Graham makes a distinction between two type of investors; the “enterprising” and the “defensive”. The enterprising investor devotes time and effort required for the selection of stocks, bonds and mutual funds that can generate higher than average market return. The defensive investor, on the other hand, lacks time or knowledge required for enterprising investing. He, therefore, places his chief emphasis on avoidance of serious mistakes or losses, aims to be free from bother and is satisfied with an average market return.

 

Enterprising investing is certainly more exciting, glamorous and rewarding compared to defensive investing. But it takes a great deal of time, effort, skill, and deeper understanding of investing to improve the result, easily achieved by the lay investor, by investing in index funds or actively managed mutual funds. A little extra knowledge of investing is not enough to beat average market return consistently over a long period of time. Even professional investors and mutual fund managers find it difficult to do better than simple market averages or index funds and most don’t.

Retail investors with their full-time jobs or superficial understanding of investing have little chance of doing successful enterprising investing. Therefore, no matter how much risk they are willing to take, they must adopt the conservative approach of defensive investing. They are also better off leaving a majority of investment decisions to professionals by investing in multi-cap category equity funds or index funds for equity part of their portfolio; and debt mutual funds that invest in high credit quality papers and simple fixed income instruments like PPF for fixed income part of their portfolio.

The only investment decision non-enterprising investors have to make is an allocation of assets between equity and fixed income; the two most important asset classes available for them. This article discusses the nature of these two asset classes, the risks associated with them, and asset allocation non-enterprising retail investors can have between the two, for their long term investments.

The need for investing in both fixed income and equity

One of the most important factors in investing is inflation. Inflation reduces the purchasing power of money, and therefore investments need to earn a return equal to inflation just to maintain purchasing power.

Interest rates on short-term fixed income instruments like bank fixed deposits, returns of liquid funds and short term debt funds investing in debt papers with 6 to 24-month duration, and interest rates on instruments like PPF move in line with inflation. Interest rates/return on these instruments go up as inflation goes up and go down as inflation goes down (the relationship is not perfect). These fixed income instruments, therefore, do the job of protecting the purchasing power of money to some extent.

(When inflation goes up, RBI increases interest rates to control inflation; but interest rate hike may also have a negative impact on the economic growth. Therefore, when inflation comes under control, interest rates are reduced to increase economic activity in the economy. This is a simplistic explanation.)

Return from liquid funds and short term debt funds temporarily go down when interest rates go up since NAV of the fund is lowered, so that new investors in these funds earn higher interest rate prevailing in the market. This effect is cancelled out when investments are held for a period equal to the modified duration of the fund. Modified duration can be thought of as the number of years at which investor can be indifferent to an increase or decrease in interest rates. Returns from debt funds when held for a period more than modified duration, after interest rates have gone up, go up since new investments and maturity proceeds of old debt papers are invested at higher interest rates. The opposite effect occurs when interest rates go down.

Modified duration is also the multiplier that roughly links interest rate changes with changes in NAV of the fund. If the modified duration of a debt fund is 1 year, NAV of this fund will reduce by 1% if there is instantaneous 1% increase in interest rates. Likewise, NAV will go up by 1% if interest rates go down by 1%. Since the modified duration of liquid funds and short term debt funds is low, they are less impacted by the interest rate changes. These funds also quickly recover from the impact of interest rate movement and start giving a return in line with prevailing interest rates in the market.

Long duration bonds and long-term debt funds on the other hand can beat inflation handsomely when inflation goes down, but there is always a danger of inflation shooting up instead of going down. If inflation shoots up, investors can get stuck with bonds that pay lower interest rate compared to inflation especially when interest rates on bank fixed deposits and returns from liquid funds and short-term debt funds have gone up.

A long-term debt fund, investing in papers with an average maturity of over 10 years can have modified duration of over 7 years. This means that if interest rates go up by 1%, this fund will lose 7% of its value and it will take 7 years for the fund to recover and reach expected return before interest rates went up. Such funds can also deliver 7% return in a single day if interest rates go down by 1%. But since non-enterprising investors cannot predict inflation and interest rate movements in the future, they are better off sticking to short duration fixed income instruments and instruments like PPF where interest rates are reset every quarter.

Return on fixed income part of the portfolio can be increased by investing in higher interest bearing instruments like co-operative bank fixed deposits or debt mutual funds that invest in lower credit quality debt papers. But the principal is also at higher risk in such instruments. A defensive investor who wants to be free from bother should stick to fixed income instruments where the principal is at minimum risk.

The trouble in keeping all money in fixed income instruments is that post-tax return from these instruments can rarely be higher than inflation, and therefore investor’s savings and investments do not grow in purchasing power. It is also difficult for a majority of retail investors to finance all their important financial goals by putting all their savings into products which generate no real return (return post inflation). Therefore, investors must also invest in instruments/asset classes that can generate a return higher than inflation.

Equity is one asset class that has given a higher return than inflation over a long period of time. The real return (return post inflation) from equity has been typically at a level of 3% to 6% in markets for which long-term market history is available. In more successful economies like the US, the real return on equity is higher than 6%. (Source: Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2018).

It is generally accepted that equity provides a hedge against inflation, but it is not entirely true. The correlation between equity returns with the rate of inflation has been small. In fact, contrary to the popular opinion held by the majority of equity investors and advisers, authors of the book Triumph of the optimist: 101 years of Global Investment Returns, note  “inflation appears to have had a negative impact both on stocks and bond markets.”

The historical evidence tends to suggest that equity does well when inflation is moderate but when inflation heats up to high levels, even equity fair badly. This is because, when inflation is mild, companies can pass the increased cost to consumers, but high inflation force consumers to cut their spending resulting in depressing activity throughout the economy.

Equity also does poorly when inflation is negative (deflation). This is because, when the prices of most goods and services go down, companies struggle to increase their profits. This is what happened in Japan after 1990.

Equity is considered as inflation hedge simply because it has generated a real return over a long period of time.

Long run equity returns can also mislead investors into underestimating the risk involved in equity investing. Returns from equity could be extreme in the short run. Here are few cases of extreme short-term equity returns to give an idea about how bad things can go wrong when they do go wrong for equity investors. US stocks lost 89 per cent of their value between 1929 and 1932 from peak to trough. In 1973-74 bear market, US stocks fell 52% in real terms. On October 19, 1987, US investors lost 23 per cent in a single day. Between March 2000 and October 2002, US stocks lost 50 per cent of their value. From October 2007 to March 2009, the value of US equity went down by 60 per cent.

Many investors and advisers show long-run return history of Indian and US equity markets and argue that equity becomes risk-free and generates a real return if held for more than 10 years. The flaw with this argument is that it takes into consideration only two equity markets, the data for which is easily available. Both these market histories have limitations of their own. India has too short equity market history to draw any meaningful conclusion about the long-term equity returns. The US, on the other hand, emerged as the most successful economy in the world. Drawing inferences based on the market history of world’s most successful economy can show long-term return from equities in an unduly favourable light and may give a misleading impression about the future expected equity return in India. It is dangerous to treat US data as universally applicable.

For a more balanced view, we also need to look at equity returns in other markets and see if the assumption that equity is guaranteed to generate a real return for all time frames greater than 10 year holds true or not. The longest period of cumulative negative real return for the US was 16 years from 1905 to 1920. This period was 22 years from 1900 to 1921 for the UK, 51 years from 1900 to 1950 for Japan, 55 years from 1900 to 1954 for Germany and 54 years from 1929 to 1982 for France. (Source: Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2018)

Japan’s leading stock index Nikkei 225 was at 38,915 at the end of 1989, close to 3 decades later, it still languishes below 23,000. Stock markets of other countries like Argentina, Italy, Russia and Switzerland have gone through similar long periods of disappointing returns.

This should be a reminder that equity returns could be poor over multiple decades and fixed income instruments can give a higher return than equity even for a few decades.

The intention here is not to scare investors out of equity but to make them aware that there are no guarantees in equity even when investments are held for long term. There is always an element of unpredictability associated with equity investing though it is highly likely to beat other asset classes over the long term.

Fixed income investing is not risk-free either; since inflation eats up all the gains and there is a risk of not accumulating enough for important financial goals in a 100% fixed income portfolio.

Investors can never completely eliminate risk from investing. Therefore, they have little choice but to allocate their long term assets both in equity and fixed income.

What should then be equity: fixed income allocation for non-enterprising investors?

In ‘The Intelligent Investor’, Benjamin Graham recommends that the equity allocation should never be less than 25% and higher than 75%. Allocation can move between these two limits depending on the market condition. If equity is available at bargain price level, equity allocation can move towards 75%; conversely, equity allocation should be lowered when market valuations are expensive.

While enterprising investors can think of dynamically managing equity: fixed income allocation, most retail investors cannot do it. Equity also has a habit of making fool of even mature investors. It further goes up when valuations are already stretched and goes further down when equity valuations appear to have bottomed out.

Benjamin Graham, therefore, recommends 50-50 formula for non-enterprising investors. He recommends investors to hold 50% of their assets in stocks, and 50% in fixed income. When changes in the market level raise equity component to say 55%, the balance is restored by selling 1/11th of the stock portfolio and transferring it to fixed income. Conversely, if fall in the equity market takes equity allocation to say 45%, 1/11th of fixed income assets are used to purchase additional equity.

This allocation makes perfect sense for a non-enterprising investor who can not dynamically manage asset allocation. If there are lucky outcomes and equity generates a real return, half of his portfolio benefits from it. On the other hand, if there are unlucky outcomes and equity underperforms fixed income, which can also happen, he is still better off compared to other investors who are heavily invested in equity.

There is more to 50-50 equity-fixed income allocation than an inability to manage asset allocation dynamically. Equity is an unpredictable asset class in the short run, but it has proven to be a reliable asset class over the long term. Therefore, to invest in equity with success, one must be a long-term investor. A 50-50 equity-debt mix makes it easier for an investor to stick to the long-term investment plan compared to more aggressive equity allocation. 50-50 allocation soothes up shocks equity throws from time to time. Even when market cracks up by 50%, a 50-50 portfolio will not go down more than 25%. 25% is still painful but is nowhere close to the pain experienced by investors with 50% portfolio drawdown.  It is far easier to stay the course with 50-50 allocation compared to aggressive equity allocation.

50-50 allocation sounds too conservative to many advisers and DIY (do it yourself) investors. These investors and advisers typically have blind faith in the long-term performance of equity and they usually recommend higher equity allocation to all investors when investment horizon is long.  Even if we assume that equity is guaranteed to outperform fixed income over the long term, there is still one flaw with this advice.

This advice doesn’t take into consideration the emotional muscle required to handle high equity allocation. Both advisers and DIY investors live in a world where equity is an inseparable part of their daily life. This is not always the case with a majority of retail investors. A high equity allocation accompanied by a bad sequence of return can make an untrained equity investor so risk averse, that his average equity allocation over a lifetime could become lower compared to a case where he is recommended a more conservative allocation.

Even 50% equity allocation is too high for an inexperienced investor; and allocation should be gradually increased to 50%, to reduce behavioural risk which is highest when an investor is inexperienced.

Many DIY investors think that they have high-risk tolerance and can withstand deep drawdowns of equity markets. In reality, their perceived high-risk tolerance is the product of favourable stock returns of the recent past. A benign market correction is enough to disrupt long-term investment strategy of most of them. It takes crazy faith in equity to stay rational in a long drawn bear market. The faith of most DIY investors in equity is too fragile to withstand 2008 like drawdown. DIY investors can do fine by not overestimating their own risk tolerance and adopting the more conservation 50-50 equity-fixed income allocation for their long-term investment portfolios.

P.S.: This article specifically talks about the long-term asset allocation for non-enterprising investors. Investors should reduce equity allocation as the goal approaches, to reduce a bad sequence of return risk.

Credit: I thank Avinash Luthria, whose SEBI RIA application is under process for useful discussions and for sharing the Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2018.

If you wish to work with Swapnil, you can contact him at Vivektaru

Do share if you found this useful

About the Author M Pattabiraman author of freefincal.comM. Pattabiraman(PhD) is the author and owner of freefincal.com.  He is an associate professor at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras since Aug 2006. Pattu” as he is popularly known, has co-authored two print-books, You can be rich too with goal based investing (CNBC TV18) and Gamechanger and seven other free e-books on various topics of money management.  He is a patron and co-founder of “Fee-only India” an organisation to promote unbiased, commission-free investment advice. Pattu publishes unbiased, promotion-free research, analysis and holistic money management advice. Freefincal serves more than one million readers a year (2.5 million page views) with numbers based analysis on topical issues and has more than a 100 free calculators on different aspects of insurance and investment analysis. He conducts free money management sessions for corporates  and associations(see details below). Previous engagements include World Bank, RBI, BHEL, Asian Paints, TamilNadu Investors Association etc. Contact information: freefincal {at} Gmail {dot} com (sponsored posts or paid collaborations will not be entertained)
Want to conduct a sales-free "basics of money management" session in your office?
I conduct free seminars to employees or societies. Only the very basics and getting-started steps are discussed (no scary math):For example: How to define financial goals, how to save tax with a clear goal in mind; How to use a credit card for maximum benefit; When to buy a house; How to start investing; where to invest; how to invest for and after retirement etc. depending on the audience. If you are interested, you can contact me: freefincal [at] Gmail [dot] com. I can do the talk via conferencing software, so there is no cost for your company. If you want me to travel, you need to cover my airfare (I live in Chennai)

Connect with us on social media


Content Policy

Freefincal has original unbiased, conflict-of-interest-free,  topical reports, reviews, commentary and analysis on all aspects of personal finance like mutual funds, stocks, insurance etc. All guest authors and contributors to the site also do not have any conflict of interest. If you find the content useful, please consider supporting us by (1) sharing our articles and (2) disabling ad-blockers for our site if you are using one. No promotional content We do not accept sponsored posts and link exchange requests from content writers and agencies. This is our privacy policy Our website is non-profit in nature. The revenue from the advertisement will only be used for hosting charges, domain registration charges, specific plugins necessary for traffic growth and analytics services for search engine optimisation.

Do check out my books


You Can Be Rich Too with Goal-Based Investing

You can be rich too with goal based investingMy first book is meant to help you ask the right questions, seek the right answers and since it comes with nine online calculators, you can also create custom solutions for your lifestyle! Get it now.  It is also available in Kindle format.
Gamechanger: Forget Startups, Join Corporate & Still Live the Rich Life You WantGamechanger: Forget Start-ups, Join Corporate and Still Live the Rich Life you wantMy second book is meant for young earners to get their basics right from day one! It will also help you travel to exotic places at low cost! Get it or gift it to a young earner

The ultimate guide to travel by Pranav Surya

Travel-Training-Kit-Cover This is a deep dive analysis into vacation planning, finding cheap flights, budget accommodation, what to do when travelling, how travelling slowly is better financially and psychologically with links to the web pages and hand-holding at every step.  Get the pdf for ₹199 (instant download)

Free Apps for your Android Phone

All calculators from our book, “You can be Rich Too” are now available on Google Play!
Install Financial Freedom App! (Google Play Store)
Install Freefincal Retirement Planner App! (Google Play Store)
Find out if you have enough to say "FU" to your employer (Google Play Store)

Blog Comment Policy

Your thoughts are vital to the health of this blog and are the driving force behind the analysis and calculators that you see here. We welcome criticism and differing opinions. I will do my very best to respond to all comments asap. Please do not include hyperlinks or email ids in the comment body. Such comments will be moderated and I reserve the right to delete the entire comment or remove the links before approving them.

4 Comments

  1. Superb post.50:50 is a very good asset allocation to most irrespective of age and caters to most circumstances. Somehow,not many give the advice on this balanced asset allocation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *