What is Robo-advice? What are the pros and cons?

In this post, I discuss the basics of robo advice, its pros and cons for the benefit of the interested layman as a lead up to the launch of the freefincal robo advisory template next week.

What is robo advisory?

Suppose you wish to plan for your daughter’s college expenses 10 years from now and wish to know how much has to be invested and where. Let us consider the inputs and outputs of this calculation.


1: The current cost of the education you have in mind (hard to come up with a number as this can change down the line, but we need some input to start with).

2: The rate at which this cost increases year upon year.

3: The return expected from the investment.

These three inputs are enough to provide the basic output: monthly investment necessary.

Even in this simple calculation, notice that input 1 is personal and inputs 2 and 3 are technical. While input 2 is only guesswork, there is a lot more to input 3, the return.

The return expected from the investment is not just a number. We need to decide how much to invest in equity and how much in fixed income. We need to know the kind of return we can expect from these over 10 years. Then we need to decide how to vary the equity allocation and fixed income allocation as the time for college admission nears.  We also need to factor in taxes.

All these are possible in the several calculators available here. In a calculator, you the user enters both the personal data and technical data.

A robo-adviser is a calculator or piece of code that accepts only personal information and pre-determines the technical input, depending on the age of the person, investment tenure and risk appetite of the person (if sought).

It then outputs an investment strategy (asset allocation for each year) with product categories and products to invest in. If you invest “via” the robo website, then they also can remind you to rebalance the portfolio periodically and also fund change recommendations.

The trouble is, even if the robo adviser suggests commission free products (eg. direct mutual funds), they often recommend only certain types of products for all needs. For eg. they would recommend only a liquid fund or ultra short term fund for a short term goal and not a bank FD or RD because that will not benefit them in any way. So it is important to recognise that there is a conflict of interest involved in direct robo portals also. This was one of the motivating factors for me to work on robo template.

By offering robo template that is free to use and unattached to any transactions, I can focus on the limitations of robo advice and try to make them better without any fear of favour.

Pros and cons of robo advisory

Consider for a moment what an MBBS degree or a financial planning certificate does. It teaches and trains the student to react in “certain ways” if they notice “certain sets of symptoms”. This is pretty much how an algorithm works at a basic level. So there is a robo element present in every profession. In fact, it is a pretty strong element.

A competent professional is not just a well trained professional. She should be able to adapt and modify her recommendation depending on the needs and status of the patient or client.

The common complaint is that a robo or a piece of software will not be able to do this.  This criticism is true in many instances, but this only means that the code does not factor in all relevant situations and needs constant modification. More importantly, the alternatives to robo advice are: true DIY (not AIFW-DIY) or working with a competent, conflict free financial planner. Not easy at all!

When it comes to financial planning, robo advice will work extremely well for young earners with uncluttered portfolios. The challenge is to make it work for older investors and especially those who are retired. This has been one of my core objectives. This area needs sustained efforts.

The first job of a robo advice software is to try and capture all the elements imparted to a financial planner during training. The second job is to capture other factors that come to light only when the financial planner interacts with clients and works on real cases.

The first job is more than possible and has been done by many. And in my case, thanks to some awesome beta-testing by friends, I am reasonably satisfied, but will leave the judgement to you.  The second job is an ongoing task for everyone.

The biggest advantage of robo algorithm is that the user does not have to worry about the competence of a planner at least with respect to basics.

The competence of a planner with respect to course corrections is an unknown when we engage them.  Wrt robots, the mathematics of investing is already coded in. The user should be able to intelligently modify the inputs as per their changing needs. Users who cannot do this, need to work with a “competent: human advisor.

So a DIY element is mandatory when it comes to robo advice. The user must strive to understand the scope of the algorithm from day one in order to use it better.

To conclude: robo advice plays a big role in our lives even if only consult human professionals. Choosing a good robo platform is as hard as choosing a good financial planner. Let’s Face It: Everyone Needs Do-it-Yourself Skills!

The challenge for robos is to handle a wide range of inputs and cough out a workable plan (free from conflicts if possible*). This is an ongoing process just as a financial planner cannot afford to stop learning.

  • My friend Raghavendra Shenoy is fuming right now 🙂

Should I use robo advice?

You can if you are young with a simple portfolio. If you are not so young with a diverse portfolio, then you must be able to judge the quality of advice given and understand the plan of action proposed. Else, approach a human planner.

If you are one of those guys looking for an explanation every time the market falls, a robo will not help. Certainly not mine.

Want to conduct a sales-free "basics of money management" session in your office?
I conduct free seminars to employees or societies. Only the very basics and getting-started steps are discussed (no scary math):For example: How to define financial goals, how to save tax with a clear goal in mind; How to use a credit card for maximum benefit; When to buy a house; How to start investing; where to invest; how to invest for and after retirement etc. depending on the audience. If you are interested, you can contact me: freefincal [at] Gmail [dot] com. I can do the talk via conferencing software, so there is no cost for your company. If you want me to travel, you need to cover my airfare (I live in Chennai)

Connect with us on social media

Do check out my books

You Can Be Rich Too with Goal-Based InvestingYou can be rich too with goal based investing

My first book is meant to help you ask the right questions, seek the right answers and since it comes with nine online calculators, you can also create customg solutions for your lifestye!Get it now.  It is also available in Kindle format.

Gamechanger: Forget Startups, Join Corporate & Still Live the Rich Life You Want

Gamechanger: Forget Start-ups, Join Corporate and Still Live the Rich Life you want My second book is meant for young earners to get their basics right from day one! It will also help you travel to exotic places at low cost! Get it or gift it to a youngearner

The ultimate guide to travel by Pranav Surya

Travel-Training-Kit-Cover This is a deep dive analysis into vacation planning, finding cheap flights, budget accommodation, what to do when travelling, how travelling slowly is better financially and psychologically with links to the web pages and hand-holding at every step.  Get the pdf for ₹199 (instant download)

Create a "from start to finish" financial plan with this free robo advisory software template

Free Apps for your Android Phone

All calculators from our book, “You can be Rich Too” are now available on Google Play!
Install Financial Freedom App! (Google Play Store)
Install Freefincal Retirement Planner App! (Google Play Store)
Find out if you have enough to say "FU" to your employer (Google Play Store)

About Freefincal

Freefincal has open-source, comprehensive Excel spreadsheets, tools, analysis and unbiased, conflict of interest-free commentary on different aspects of personal finance and investing. If you find the content useful, please consider supporting us by (1) sharing our articles and (2) disabling ad-blockers for our site if you are using one. We do not accept sponsored posts, links or guest posts request from content writers and agencies.

Blog Comment Policy

Your thoughts are vital to the health of this blog and are the driving force behind the analysis and calculators that you see here. We welcome criticism and differing opinions. I will do my very best to respond to all comments asap. Please do not include hyperlinks or email ids in the comment body. Such comments will be moderated and I reserve the right to delete the entire comment or remove the links before approving them.

6 thoughts on “What is Robo-advice? What are the pros and cons?

  1. Waiting to try the robo. Another thing I found with using the robo advisory of fund houses is you are not confident whether the recommendation itself is a promotion of their fund or a genuine advise.
    Good one on AIFW DIY. I think Ashal would be equivalent of “Robo”.

  2. This is much needed thing, as there is a huge gap, and scope as well, here. In fact, i came
    across your site while searching for robo-advisory only. Later on, during email exchanges with you, i came to know that you are already working on it and now its due to be rolled-out.

    am eagerly waiting to see that, specially the variable and constantly changing asset allocation, as this is not available in any robo-advisory, at least whatever i have come across.

  3. On robo advice platforms NOT being conflict free, here’s my $.0002 – In comparison with advice from a financial planner wherein an advisor working in commission mode CAN or MAY recommend a product that is in his/her best interest than that of the client, in a robo the portfolio recommendations remain the same for all investors with a certain risk tolerance bracket. While this means that the portfolios are not custom designed for each investor, the bucket portfolio nature in itself means that it is relatively conflict free.

    1. I dont disagree and I cannot comment about the situation elsewhere but here, there are whispers (even tweets) of direct players (RIAs robo or human, I can’t tell) receiving some kind of “encouragement” from AMCs.

Comments are closed.