After spotting mutual fund underperformers in the portfolio, what is the next step? The options may seem quite obvious and there is not much to write about. I decided to write a post about it (instead of mentioning this in the last post itself) for two reasons:
- Handling underperformers in the portfolios has some interesting aspects of investment risk.
- Ashal Jauhari's standard answer to this topic is deeply insightful and deserves some spotlight.
Now, let us assume that there is a fund we have an SIP running in, for say the last 4 years. we ae not satisfied with it and would like to shift our SIP to another fund that has been shortlisted.
A question that many investors ask, 'how should I shift? What should I do with my old units?'
Ashal's brilliant answer to this question is, "you are merely changing trains. Therefore, redeem all existing units and invest in the new one shot and start a new SIP there".
It is brilliant not only because it is easy to understand, but also it is one of the very few succinct, yet eloquent, textual description of investment mathematics.
Ashal often likes to say that his recommendations are not 'mathematical' like mine. He is not often wrong, but he is here. Pretty much every recommendation of his is soaked in mathematical logic.
Take the train analogy above. What is meant by changing trains here? We are shifting from one asset class to another. The risk has not changed. The day before we switched, a lump sum (our existing units) was invested in the old fund exposed to the full volatility of the market.
Remember, that SIPs do not reduce the risk of the total investment made. It merely averages the entry price of the next instalment. Trivia: A good 49 equity funds (excluding sector funds) have single-digit 10-year SIP returns. SIP is only a method of buying fund units. It is important to not get married to our SIPs.
Now back to the train analogy. Assuming the new fund also belongs to the same asset class, we are going to start an SIP in it. Why not shift all old units to the new fund in one shot? Are we going to lose anything by doing that? The underlying market risk has not changed. The 'we are merely changing trains' response bring this point out beautifully.
The reason this simple point requires elaboration is because not many are comfortable doing this. They believe that the lump sum must be gradually shifted. Why? Because it is a lump sum? It is not just a lump sum. It is a lump sum already in the market!
So there are now two choices: (a) switch in one-shot and start SIP in the new fund or (b) leave alone old units and start SIP in the new fund.
Option (b) is probably a guaranteed road to portfolio clutter!
Perhaps many may not agree with me, but I feel that starting out with an ELSS mutual fund for tax saving tends to clutter the folio. By the time they no longer need the 80C break, the folio of many already has 2/3 ELSS funds - 'hot' funds collected year after year. Then new non-ELSS funds are added while the ELSS funds stay back in the folio for years.
I feel it is better to use instruments like PPF for tax saving after accounting for tax saving expenses like term life covers, children's tuition fee, home loan principal. Then if there is room, use PPF as part of a diversified portfolio. This again is Ashal's idea: Making the best use of section 80C for tax saving: an example.
The same arguments also apply to those who would like to reduce the number of funds in the folio with the sole aim of reducing clutter? Just do it!
In case you are wondering who Ashal Jauhari is, he is the administration of Facebook group, Asan Ideas of Wealth. You can know more about here: Interview with Ashal Jauhari: Relentless Financial Awareness Activist