Do not enter equity markets if you do not know how to get out!

“How can I fund my goal if the market crashes a few years before I need the money?” is a question that I have often encountered. In this post (and the next), I address this issue with some specific examples.

An exit strategy is more important than an entry strategy

Suppose I can invest Rs. 1,000 a month and after a few years, the money has grown to Rs. 1,00,000 (more than possible seen it happen with a Rs. 500 SIP). Should I worry about when to invest 1,000 looking at market levels (aka dip buying) or should I be worried about the risk associated with the 1,00,000?

The point is, no matter when you buy, if the market crashes, the corpus will fall in value. Therefore, I would rather focus my time and energy on the managing the risk associated with the corpus while systematically investing each month. Read more: Managing Risk Without Stopping Mutual Fund SIPs.

Multiple solutions to every problem

Every problem has multiple solutions and it is immature to claim one is better than the other. Just a matter of choosing a strategy that we are comfortable with. Reducing corpus risk (aka de-risking) is no different.

For example, I can continue to invest systematically and

  • Change the asset allocation of my portfolio (equity:fixed income ratio) as per market conditions (aka dynamic asset allocation)
  • Change the asset allocation with a set plan (aka strategic asset allocation)
  • Use a combination of (1) and (2) above.

In addition to the above, I must also have a de-risking strategy in mind. 

De-risking strategies

This post is about de-risking strategies. Consider that my asset allocation is 60% equity and 40% fixed income for a financial goal that is 15 years away. To understand how this is chosen in the first place, see deciding on asset allocation for a financial goal.

I cannot afford to maintain this asset allocation for the entire 15 years. As the goal approaches, I must have a strategy in place to reduce equity allocation. This is what the title refers.

The Chakravyuha labyrinth from the Mahabharatha. Knowledge of entry is not as important of knowledge of exiting. Arjuna's son Abhimanyu was trapped inside because he only knew how to enter. Image source wikipedia.
The Chakravyuha labyrinth from the Mahabharatha. Knowledge of entry is not as important of knowledge of exit. Arjuna’s son Abhimanyu was trapped inside because he only knew how to enter. Image source Wikipedia.

Again there are multiple de-risking strategies and I will refer to two that appeal to me.

Returns do not matter

Surprising as it seems, investment returns do not say much about our ability to finance the future. A guy with an LIC policy can end up with more money than an equity guy. Not just because of the risk associated with the latter, but because of the amount invested.

When I perform a financial audit, the only question matters to me is, “what is the corpus worth?”.

If it is retirement, I ask :”If I retire with it today, how long can I be financially independent”.

Or to be more specific, “Is my fixed income asset allocation enough to guarantee me an inflation-protected income for the first 10-15 years in retirement” and the equity allocation enough to grow undisturbed for that amount of time to serve me later.

If it is my son’s education, I ask “What kind of education can I afford today?”.

My son is only about 7 years old and in the 1st standard. By the time he goes to 8th or 9th standard I will have a better idea of how much I will need to pay for his education. So I then starting ensuring that my fixed income assets have an amount close to that. So in the next 3-4 years, before he goes to college, the corpus is reasonably protected from market volatility.

The idea behind this strategy is to shift from equity to fixed income assets such that you ensure things go to plan. I like this because there is nothing technical about this. Just simple common sense.

This idea might seem impossible to you if you have just started out. Trust me, I would have felt the same 3-4 years ago. Give it a little time and you will see what I mean. December is personal financial audit month. So I will give more concrete examples.

Changing Asset Allocation in Stages

The second method is to change asset allocation with time. Or in particular decrease equity allocation gradually. An illustration is shown below. I will post back-testing results with S&P 500 based on this strategy tomorrow.


Other de-risking strategies based on market timing, fear of impending events, Lok Sabha elections etc. can easily be formulated.

Check out reviews for You can be rich too


If you have not purchased it, you can do via Please consider writing a review either at

Part II

The second part of this study is here: How to systematically reduce the risk associated with a SIP

2 thoughts on “Do not enter equity markets if you do not know how to get out!

  1. After reading this article I think that; the whole idea of Balanced Funds which invest in debt & equity as per market condition is total blunder.
    Most of the time they are advertised as:
    Instead of doing portfolio management for multiple funds like 1 blue chip, 2 Mid & Small Index, 2 Debt funds etc. you should buy only 1 balanced fund & just relaxed .

    As you can not re-balance your debt/equity proportion once you are about to reach your goal these funds are not at all useful for any type of goals.

    What is your comment sir ?

  2. I do thought of another strategy for the purpose of education of your children.

    How about taking an education loan and pre-pay in full just after the completion of the course? This will give you an extra 2-4 years for your asset re-allocation. If you taking the loan from any PSU banks, your prepayment charges will be negligible. This is like having an almost interest free loan for 2-4 years.

    Is there any pitfall in this strategy?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *