Financial Goal Planning with a Unified Portfolio

Nearly three years ago, I was introduced to an interesting idea in goal-based investing by Chenthil Iyer, Horus financials.

You invest a monthly sum of X in a single portfolio for all financial goals. The portfolio is allowed to grow and when the time for each goal arrives, the necessary sum is withdrawn. The final value of the portfolio should be equal to the retirement corpus.

Ideally, the corpus will evolve with time like this

sensex-return-3

The dips in value correspond to redemptions made for different financial goals (except retirement).

So the aim is to find the monthly investment X for a given inflation, return and duration for each goal.

I first published a calculator based on this idea in Aug. 31st 2012: Optimize Your Goal Investment Amount

This was followed up with two variants in the  Four part series on Goal Based Investing

All the while I have never been comfortable about this strategy and do not practice it for my goals.

On paper the strategy looks quite impressive for more than one reason:

1) Simplicity. One portfolio. Less number of funds. Less time managing it.

2) The investment amount X in the unified portfolio approach will be significantly lower than the total investment amount if the goals had been treated independently (see why below) . So this makes people sit up, take notice, get motivated and adapt it.

However, it is important to consider the issues associated with such a portfolio.

Some people tend to treat long-term (10Y+) and short-term goals with this approach. This means that a 5 year goal and a 15-year goal will have the same asset allocation.

This is obviously incorrect.  So I think the unified portfolio should only be used for long-term goals.

Which brings us to the  question:

Are all long-term financial goals the same?

Can you use the same asset allocation for a 10-year goal and 25-year goal? Do they both have the same risk profile? That is in terms of what they mean to you.

I would like to answer this in two ways: (1) with some math and (2) how I personally view it .

Let us start with slides that I use for the investor workshops.

This is the average Sensex CAGr of every 5, 7, 10, 15-year durations between 1979 to 2013. The corresponding standard deviation is also plotted.

sensex-return-1

The standard deviation is a measure of how much actual returns will deviation from the average. That is, it is the error in the average.

For 5 years, the return is ~ 17% +/- 14%(std dev.) A huge spread in returns.

From 14% for 5 years, the spread drops to about 9% for 10Y, 5% for 15Y and 4% for 20Y.

The same information can also be presented in this way:

sensex-return-2

Do not make the conclusion that the difference between the maximum and minimum returns will drop to zero with time. It will not. Remember our markets are still too young.

The swing in returns possible for a 10Y goal is considerably different from that a 15Y goal and a 20Y goal.

So it makes no sense (at least to me) to group them together and use the unified portfolio.

So my answer is: not all long-term goals are the same

This is why I prefer to manage them individually under separate portfolios. I may start off with a 60% equity allocation but with time, this will change (decrease) for goals like my son's education and not retirement. In fact, I  now use 100% equity for his marriage (not a top priority to me and I am not  investing enough for it. Can't rather.).

Individual portfolios allow me to track the goals better, take a different and hopefully appropriate amount of risk.

As noted above, the investment required for a unified portfolio is much smaller than for individual portfolios. The reason for that is the unified portfolio takes into account future cash flows.

For example, if my retirement is 25 years away and my son's college education is 15 years away, I can invest more for retirement after 15 years.

The unified portfolio factors that in now itself. Is this not a smart thing to do?

Not really. We are assuming the future will turn out like it does on an Excel sheet.

I have enough experience to not take that kind of a risk. It is folly to assume future cash inflows can be used the way we want. Life may have other plans for us.

If you do not have enough to invest to for each goal separately, it is okay to use the unified portfolio approach. However, be sure to invest more in future (if and) when you are able to do so.

Also de-risking the corpus (that is reducing equity exposure) a few years before the goal is crucial. This is easier to do with individual folios.  You can also start with a single portfolio and branch out before each goal. So many ways to play it.

Is it not hard to manage individual folios? Not if you are a patient investor who takes informed decisions. There are so many folio trackers today that it is not hard at all.

Will not be too many mutual funds?  One or two equity funds per goal is not that big a deal.

I write this post as a note of caution.

I recently listened to Dr. Uma Shashikant discuss this method with a group of advisors. Inspired by this, I reworked the above sheets and used it for the Chennai and Hyderabad investor meets.

This is a note of caution for all participants that there are disadvantages associated with this method.

While I do not recommend it, it can serve as a motivation to start investing for goals.

This is the latest version of the

goal planner with a unified portfolio

Use with abundant caution.

 

Install Financial Freedom App! (Google Play Store)

Install Freefincal Retirement Planner App! (Google Play Store)

book-footer

Buy our New Book!

You Can Be Rich With Goal-based Investing A book by  P V Subramanyam (subramoney.com) & M Pattabiraman. Hard bound. Price: Rs. 399/- and Kindle Rs. 349/-. Read more about the book and pre-order now!
Practical advice + calculators for you to develop personalised investment solutions

Thank you for reading. You may also like

About Freefincal

Freefincal has open-source, comprehensive Excel spreadsheets, tools, analysis and unbiased, conflict of interest-free commentary on different aspects of personal finance and investing. If you find the content useful, please consider supporting us by (1) sharing our articles and (2) disabling ad-blockers for our site if you are using one. We do not accept sponsored posts, links or guest posts request from content writers and agencies.

Blog Comment Policy

Your thoughts are vital to the health of this blog and are the driving force behind the analysis and calculators that you see here. We welcome criticism and differing opinions. I will do my very best to respond to all comments asap. Please do not include hyperlinks or email ids in the comment body. Such comments will be moderated and I reserve the right to delete  the entire comment or remove the links before approving them.

18 thoughts on “Financial Goal Planning with a Unified Portfolio

  1. Anand Doctor

    The multi-goal : multi portfolio approach is practically more effective. For the reasons stated by you above as well as another reason:
    What happens if you fall short of your overall portfolio objective? Most people will sacrifice their retirement nest egg to finance the current shortfall i.e. kids'm education, wedding expenses, even vacation, jewelry, luxury electronics etc.One amorphous portfolio lets one think that there's more money or that more money can be made later.
    Separate portfolios don't allow you to fool yourself. Also, one is likely to be much more disciplined when tracking important goals separately. This reduces frivilous spending. So I prefer to create separate portfolios for each goal of my clients.

    However, there is one risk with this approach: Underestimating the necessary, mundane and periodically repeating goals/expenses.
    viz. repainting the house/apartment, buying the replacement car/refrigerator/washing machine/television/computer...so on ans so forth.

    These usually fall between the cracks as they are neither monthly/annually recurring expenses nor aspirational goals. So if you're following the multi portfolio approach, ensure that you include these goals as well. Else, make them part of your expense calculations.

    Just don't forget them!

    Reply
  2. Anand Doctor

    The multi-goal : multi portfolio approach is practically more effective. For the reasons stated by you above as well as another reason:
    What happens if you fall short of your overall portfolio objective? Most people will sacrifice their retirement nest egg to finance the current shortfall i.e. kids'm education, wedding expenses, even vacation, jewelry, luxury electronics etc.One amorphous portfolio lets one think that there's more money or that more money can be made later.
    Separate portfolios don't allow you to fool yourself. Also, one is likely to be much more disciplined when tracking important goals separately. This reduces frivilous spending. So I prefer to create separate portfolios for each goal of my clients.

    However, there is one risk with this approach: Underestimating the necessary, mundane and periodically repeating goals/expenses.
    viz. repainting the house/apartment, buying the replacement car/refrigerator/washing machine/television/computer...so on ans so forth.

    These usually fall between the cracks as they are neither monthly/annually recurring expenses nor aspirational goals. So if you're following the multi portfolio approach, ensure that you include these goals as well. Else, make them part of your expense calculations.

    Just don't forget them!

    Reply
  3. sundararajan

    Thanks for all your postings on finance. Almost all the posts, I have seen beating inflation is the main point of discussion. Is it possible for you to publish (if there is a one already, please point to me) detail inflation for the past 20/30 years (since the day of sensex 1979..) on yearly basis. Over all there is a perception that inflation is between 8 to 10%, but not sure exactly. I know the effect of inflation myself and from my parents, but would like to see the exact number to know what will be the effect in the future. (instead of just assuming) Also, the comparison of costs of food items / rent/ or medical cost etc in 70/80 to 2015 etc will sure create an awareness of inflation. Most people would like to see the real numbers to believe it.
    If this is too much or if that information is not available, you may ignore this post.

    Reply
  4. sundararajan

    Thanks for all your postings on finance. Almost all the posts, I have seen beating inflation is the main point of discussion. Is it possible for you to publish (if there is a one already, please point to me) detail inflation for the past 20/30 years (since the day of sensex 1979..) on yearly basis. Over all there is a perception that inflation is between 8 to 10%, but not sure exactly. I know the effect of inflation myself and from my parents, but would like to see the exact number to know what will be the effect in the future. (instead of just assuming) Also, the comparison of costs of food items / rent/ or medical cost etc in 70/80 to 2015 etc will sure create an awareness of inflation. Most people would like to see the real numbers to believe it.
    If this is too much or if that information is not available, you may ignore this post.

    Reply
  5. JD(Bharuch)

    Good article once again
    I am using your existing goal planner sheet and i think you already have there different goal tracker / folio tracker.
    with above illustration, can we make conclusion that, for retirement lumsum investment is good than SIP, providing if you have corpus in hand? ( i said for RETIREMENT). My reason is same as you explained that with longer duration goal, volatility reduced compare to near goal.

    Well overall i like idea but with individual goal, if you plan to review folio each year , it will be really mesh even with 2 or 3 MFs? ( Suppose you need to change fund )

    It was my 2 cent. may be i take it other way.
    thanks guru

    JigDaherawala

    Reply
  6. JD(Bharuch)

    Good article once again
    I am using your existing goal planner sheet and i think you already have there different goal tracker / folio tracker.
    with above illustration, can we make conclusion that, for retirement lumsum investment is good than SIP, providing if you have corpus in hand? ( i said for RETIREMENT). My reason is same as you explained that with longer duration goal, volatility reduced compare to near goal.

    Well overall i like idea but with individual goal, if you plan to review folio each year , it will be really mesh even with 2 or 3 MFs? ( Suppose you need to change fund )

    It was my 2 cent. may be i take it other way.
    thanks guru

    JigDaherawala

    Reply
  7. Pingback: Second Chennai investor workshop videos

  8. Pingback: Second Chennai investor workshop videos

Do let us know what you think about the article