NPS: Partial Withdrawal Rules 2016

The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) has announced guidelines regarding partial withdrawal from the National Pension System (NPS).

(1) A subscriber whose NPS account is at least 10 years old will be eligible for withdrawing 25% of  his/her contributions alone. Employer contributions (if any) cannot be withdrawn. Notice the similarity with the recently announced EPF withdrawal rules.

Although the circular says, 25% of accumulations due to self-contributions, the application form appended to the circular (link below), make it clear that it is Max 25% of own contributions without accrued income earned thereon.

Tax Status. There is no explicit mention of this. My understanding is, since 40% withdrawal from NPS corpus is tax-free, partial withdrawals should also count under this limit. That is, the overall tax-free limit is 40% of the total amount withdrawn over time.

The amount withdrawn should also count under the total amount that can be withdrawn. Clarity is required with respect to this after Budget 2016. We only know that 40% of total corpus is tax-free if withdrawn (thanks to Manoj Nagpal for finding out about this, as well as posting about the present circular on twitter)

(2) The withdrawal can only be made for specific reason as noted in the PFRDA circular


Twenty-five percent limit for points (a,b and c) is quite reasonable. Anybody which has seen the terms of a critical illness cover will immediately recognise  the illnesses listed in (d). For such an illness a much larger limit would be helpful, especially if withdrawals have been made earlier.

(3) only 3 partial withdrawals are possible and each withdrawal must be spaced 5 years apart. For the subsequent withdrawal, only incremental contributions made after the earlier withdrawal will be eligible for redemption.   I think the 25% rule will also apply to incremental contributions! (Awful!)

(4) The withdrawal application by the subscriber (for reasons a,b,c) or relatives in case illness as stated in (d) should be submitted to the point-of-presence POP office. They will have to verify the authenticity of the claim and forward it to CRA. For (a,b,c) processing time is 3 days. For (d) - illness same day. After that there should be a direct bank credit within 3 days.

Opinion: Just how useful is this feature? Not very. In fact, I would use this as another reason to not join the NPS or shift from EPF.

The EPF subscriber has much more control over the entire corpus arising from his/her contributions. Stay away from the NPS.

Register for the Hyderabad DIY Investor Workshop Nov 27th 2016

Check out the latest mutual fund returns listing


Buy our New Book!

You Can Be Rich With Goal-based Investing A book by  P V Subramanyam ( & M Pattabiraman. Hard bound. Price: Rs. 399/- (Rs. 359/- at Read more about the book and pre-order now!
Practical advice + calculators for you to develop personalised investment solutions

Thank you for reading. You may also like

About Freefincal

Freefincal has open-source, comprehensive Excel spreadsheets, tools, analysis and unbiased, conflict of interest-free commentary on different aspects of personal finance and investing. If you find the content useful, please consider supporting us by (1) sharing our articles and (2) disabling ad-blockers for our site if you are using one. We do not accept sponsored posts, links or guest posts request from content writers and agencies.

Do more with freefincal!

Blog Comment Policy

Your thoughts are vital to the health of this blog and are the driving force behind the analysis and calculators that you see here. We welcome criticism and differing opinions. I will do my very best to respond to all comments asap. Please do not include hyperlinks or email ids in the comment body. Such comments will be moderated and I reserve the right to delete  the entire comment or remove the links before approving them.

4 thoughts on “NPS: Partial Withdrawal Rules 2016

  1. s.sudhir

    In financial aspects of the investors, the government is not having favorable laws, 3/4th taxpayers in employment group or salaried people are middle class. FM is one of the worst who has not gone to the intricate problems these retired employees are facing, He should not tax them or cut or impose tax on their savings, FM is targeting on the employee's EPF PPF and GPf, NPS, Mutual funds, and jewellers.... he does not have any source to recover.


    If any body have invested in NPS and wanted to shift to PPF then it is possible and if what is the way.

  3. Pingback: Do Not Invest Rs. 50,000 in NPS For Saving Tax!

  4. Pingback: NPS Calculator: How the National Pension Scheme works

Do let us know what you think about the article