Mutual Fund Analysis: Reliance Growth Fund

With an aim to encourage readers to analyse and evaluate mutual fund performance on their own, using my excel files when possible ;), I would like to post the analysis of a fund from time to time.

In the past, I have covered HDFC Top 200 twice:

  1. Step by step analysis guide
  2. Rolling returns analysis

and have covered Franklin India Blue Chip several times

  1. Daily vs. Monthly vs. Quarterly SIP
  2. Rolling returns analysis
  3. Mutual Fund risk and return measures

This time I would like to discuss Reliance Growth.

Reliance Growth is, according to Value Research, a ‘multi-cap’ fund, presently with about 44% mid- and small-cap exposure out of its 95% equity exposure.

It is well known that Reliance Growth was the darling of investors not too long ago. It has an AUM of 4205 Crores.  It is also well known that its performance has dipped in the recent past.

Here is how your investment would have evolved had you started a SIP on April 3rd 2006.

Reliance Growth SIP

A CAGR of 7.75%.  Not spectacular for a period of 7.9 years, but not terrible either(?!)  This plot was generated with the automated mutual fund and financial goal tracker in development.  If you would like to test it out, a beta version is available.

The aim of this analysis is not to pan the fund manager (too much!) or to criticise investors who continue to show faith it.  The aim is to reiterate simple (enough) analysis techniques that can any investor (with inclination) can use to evaluate a fund performance. This post has been on the agenda for quite a while and got precipitated after a discussion thread in Asan Ideas for Wealth, FB group.

While this will not be an exhaustive analysis using risk and return metrics, I think it will be good enough for most investors to evaluate how consistent a fund is performing when evaluated with its benchmark.

A quick primer on rolling returns:

  • Suppose I want to determine fund performance from 1st Jan 2000 to 31st Dec. 2012, I choose some interval. Let say this is one year.
  • I calculate the return for the fund and its benchmark from 1st Jan. 2000 to 31st Dec. 2000.Then from 2nd Jan. 2000 to 1st Jan. 2001.
  • Then from 3rd Jan. 2000 to 2nd Jan 2001 and so on until I reach 31st Dec. 2012.
  • This ‘rolling’ return is then plotted against the duration used.
  • If the funds rolling returns is higher than the benchmarks most part of the graph, you can conclude that the fund has been consistent  in its outperformance.
  • Rolling returns give you an idea about consistency of funds performance with respect to its benchmark.

A more detailed explanation can be found here.

Now for the analysis

  1. First we use the Automated Mutual Fund SIP Returns Analyzer, select fund, select an index (Choose among: BSE Sensex, CNX Nifty, CNX Midcap, CNX 500 and BSE Bankex), select SIP or lump sum investment dates (after 3rd April 2006) and analyze returns.

Observe Results:

 RG-sip-table

    • Bad news: performance for the last 4+ years has …. to say the very least, not been good. Reliance Growth is benchmarked with the BSE 100. Since there is almost 100% correlation between the movements of BSE 100 and BSE Sensex, the latter is a good enough ‘alternative’ benchmark
    • Bad news: The recent poor run has affect ‘long’ term (5- 7 years) investors too
    • Good news (?): There seems to be some improvement in the performance of SIP investments.
    • I will soon be adding more benchmarks and update the format of this tool. The above figure is a collated view where I have added the index figures. The tool only displays only index figures. Since the tool is optimised for SIP returns, certain lump sum dates don’t seem to return results (blanks). I will try to fix this.
  1. To get a better idea about how consistent the fund has performed with respect to the Sensex we will use the Automated Mutual Fund Rolling Returns Calculator

This allows the user to evaluate rolling returns automatically from 3rd April 2006 onwards.

Here is the normalized plots of the fund wrt Sensex.

Reliance Growth recent performance

Notice that the fund has struggled to sustain momentum. While it recovered admirably from the 2008 crash, it fell back on the index late last year. Although it has since recovered, it is important to recognise that it is gaining lost ground.

Notice how the fund outperformed the Sensex just before the 2008 crash. This is typical of most equity funds. This reminds us of the importance of proper asset allocation depending on the time frame of investment. Too much equity can destroy a folio under such circumstances.

The one-year rolling return

RG-1Y

These are point to point returns obtained using the compound interest formula. The numbers would more sedate if XIRR is used. This data is also available in the rolling returns calculator.

Notice that over 1-year periods the fund has performed like an index fund. Nothing abnormal about this. HDFC Top 200 and Franklin India Blue Chip are no different.

Now let us look at 5-year rolling returns.

Reliance Growth 5 year rolling returns

 Notice that the fund has behaved like an index fund since June 2008. This is simply not good enough for an ‘active’ fund, in my opinion, and stinks of a muddled approach. Why should I pay a hefty expense ratio (2.23% for the ‘regular’ fund) for a fund to perform like an index?

  1. Reliance Growth has been around for nearly 20 years has an excellent track record, until recently that is. Have a look

Reliance Growth Since Inception

I have used since inception NAV obtained from the AMC along with BSE 100 data obtained from the BSE website.

Spectacular, wouldn’t you say?! Sight for sore eyes. Here are the 15-year rolling returns.

RG-15Y
Please ignore absolute values.  The trend is accurate.  Again, quite astonishing outperformance. However, notice the gradual decline.

In order to understand the reason for this long term outpeformance, one should plot the 1-year rolling returns since inception.

Reliance Growth 1-year since inception rolling return

Notice the terrific run the fund had frominception till about mid of 2005. Since then the fund has behaved as an index fund!!

The huge gap between the fund and its index that we see today stems from gains made when the fund outperformed its index from inception to mid of 2005.

Investors from the early 2000s would still be sitting on good gains. More recent investors would probably be ruing their choice and considering their options.

Again, this is nothing special.  Franklin India Blue Chip also has a similar history.

However, the long term rolling returns (5-year plus) of FIBCF or HDFC Top 200 does not merge with its benchmark for such extended periods as Reliance Growth has done – nearly a decade!

The more the I see such trends in active funds, the more I am convinced that passive or index investing is the norm and ‘alpha’ is either a random occurrence which you are lucky enough to be part of or cannot be sustained for long.

Have a look at the 5-year rolling returns since inception

Reliance Growth since incpetion 5 year rolling returnsThe drop in performance is stark and quite dramatic. What is worse is that the standard deviation of these rolling returns is 3 times more volatile than BSE 100! (get more insights from the ‘analysis’ sheet). This suggests thatrisk that Reliance Growth takes is typically not proportional to the  reward that it offers.

This is indeed troubling.  If I were an investor (I am not), I would exit to greener pastures. Perhaps the fund performance would improve. Perhaps it would once again prove to be the darling of investors.

Exit or stay put, either way it is a risk.

Surely exiting to an index fund or passive fund based on CNX 500 (or a combination of Nifty and Nifty Junior) would involve lower risk than staying put in a fund that seems listless!  Would you agree?

Download the Reliance Growth vs. BSE 100 Rolling Returns Calculator

Do give the tools described here a try.  You are sure to learn something new and surprising. Believe me, for I did and continue to do so.

Install Financial Freedom App! (Google Play Store)

Install Freefincal Retirement Planner App! (Google Play Store)

book-footer

Buy our New Book!

You Can Be Rich With Goal-based Investing A book by  P V Subramanyam (subramoney.com) & M Pattabiraman. Hard bound. Price: Rs. 399/- and Kindle Rs. 349/-. Read more about the book and pre-order now!
Practical advice + calculators for you to develop personalised investment solutions

Thank you for reading. You may also like

About Freefincal

Freefincal has open-source, comprehensive Excel spreadsheets, tools, analysis and unbiased, conflict of interest-free commentary on different aspects of personal finance and investing. If you find the content useful, please consider supporting us by (1) sharing our articles and (2) disabling ad-blockers for our site if you are using one. We do not accept sponsored posts, links or guest posts request from content writers and agencies.

Blog Comment Policy

Your thoughts are vital to the health of this blog and are the driving force behind the analysis and calculators that you see here. We welcome criticism and differing opinions. I will do my very best to respond to all comments asap. Please do not include hyperlinks or email ids in the comment body. Such comments will be moderated and I reserve the right to delete  the entire comment or remove the links before approving them.

12 thoughts on “Mutual Fund Analysis: Reliance Growth Fund

  1. Ramamurthy

    Suppose the fund of your choice gives a trailing compounded annual return of say 8% over 5 Years and the corresponding bench mark index gives you a return of say 7%.The Fund Manager is happy and he gets a bonus. As an investor are you happy?Better comparison would in my opinion would be with, say any Fixed interest bearing instrument which gives you 10% interest.

    Reply
    1. pattu

      Excellent question. The post-tax returns of any fixed interest instrument can be used for comparison. However, low returns is something a long term mf investor will have to live with. A single good year can make the returns double digit. So patience is mandatory. Once the returns exceed expectations, profits will have to be booked to low -risk instruments. That is the only way to gain and preserve gains. Of course all these do not apply for a typical retiree.

      Reply
  2. Ramamurthy

    Suppose the fund of your choice gives a trailing compounded annual return of say 8% over 5 Years and the corresponding bench mark index gives you a return of say 7%.The Fund Manager is happy and he gets a bonus. As an investor are you happy?Better comparison would in my opinion would be with, say any Fixed interest bearing instrument which gives you 10% interest.

    Reply
    1. pattu

      Excellent question. The post-tax returns of any fixed interest instrument can be used for comparison. However, low returns is something a long term mf investor will have to live with. A single good year can make the returns double digit. So patience is mandatory. Once the returns exceed expectations, profits will have to be booked to low -risk instruments. That is the only way to gain and preserve gains. Of course all these do not apply for a typical retiree.

      Reply
    1. pattu

      Viren, The idea here is to compare a situation with 100% risk to a situation with near-zero risk. This is routinely in risk-return statistics to get an idea of 'risk adjusted returns'

      In the present case, a person in the 10% slab investing in an RD would have done better than Reliance Growth. So the question is, is it worth the risk?

      Yes if the goal is still many years away and no if the goal is just a couple of years away!

      Reply
    1. pattu

      Viren, The idea here is to compare a situation with 100% risk to a situation with near-zero risk. This is routinely in risk-return statistics to get an idea of 'risk adjusted returns'

      In the present case, a person in the 10% slab investing in an RD would have done better than Reliance Growth. So the question is, is it worth the risk?

      Yes if the goal is still many years away and no if the goal is just a couple of years away!

      Reply
  3. Viren

    Yes, I got the point... but somehow I am not able to digest it.....
    isn't it going the asset allocation way? I mean, we get to the same point that our portfolio ideally must consist of equity and debt both.... so if a person is not comfortable with volatility, his portfolio becomes complete debt... Ok, fine.. personal choice.....
    but why compare equity and debt? (I hope I am not sounding irritating 🙁 )

    Reply
    1. pattu

      I understand your problem. When it comes to returns, inflation is the benchmark. When it comes to risk, we need a benchmark. For that we need to know the risk-free post-tax return. If my equity instrument over a long enough period has failed to better the risk-free post-tax return, we classify the instrument as an underperformer.

      This is from the point of view of an analyst. From the point of view of the investor, the analysis would require the goal duration. In the present case, RG has underperformed nearly for 7 years. If my goals is ANOTHER 10-15 years down the line, this return is not a terrible one. I could either stay invested or get out depending on my NET portfolio returns and the returns needed.

      Reply

Do let us know what you think about the article