Mutual Fund Expense Ratio: Direct Plan vs Regular Plan

The expense ratio of direct mutual fund plans is a subject of debate among those who do not benefit from it. In this post, Balaji Swaminathan digs deep into the annual reports from three AMCs to understand how the expense ratios compare and whether the absence of commission is the only reason for the lower expense ratio in direct plans.

This is a significant improvement over the previously published Understanding the Total Expense Ratio of a Mutual Fund using the annual report of FT Smaller Companies fund. Before we look at that fund again, let us consider a simple case.

HDFC Top 200 Expense Ratio Analysis

First, Balaji compiled the quarterly AUM (qAUM) averages for direct and regular plans from AMFI. He then used the average of the quarterly data to compute the expense ratio as a percentage of this average AUM.

This had to be done as the exact average AUM used in the annual report for regular and direct plans are not known.

HDFC-Top-200-Expense-Ratio

Notice that there is practically no discrepancy between the estimated and reported expense ratio. The amount of management fee charged is the same for direct and regular plans.

PPFAS Long Term Value Fund Expense Ratio Analysis

PPFAS is the second direct to investor mutual fund after quantum despite having a regular option! That could have been guessed from how eager they are to interact ‘directly’ with investors!

PPFAS-Long-Term-Value-Fund-Expense-Ratio

The trouble here is the presence of the two greyed entries. We have not seen that in any other annual report. Using that skews the expense ratio estimated significantly. So until there is more clarity on this, they have not been included in the total expense ratio.

If that is acceptable, there is no discrepancy between the estimate the value reported in the annual report. The management fees are also the same.

Franklin India Smaller Companies Fund Expense Ratio Analysis

This was considered in the above-mentioned post but not explored further. If we repeat the above calculation where the management fee is the same for regular and direct plans, there is a huge discrepancy in the direct plan expense ratio.

Franklin-Templeton-Smaller-Companies-Fund-Expense-Ratio

However, Franklin has clearly mentioned in the annual report that the management fee as a percentage of AAUm is

1.33% of Regular plan AAUM and

0.7% of Direct plan AAuM.

There is a huge difference between how regular fund investors  and direct fund investors are charges. Yet another reason to get rid of regular plans. Well at least, for this (and such) fund(s)!!

If the calculation is repeated after taking into account this difference, the estimate is reasonable.

Franklin-Templeton-Smaller-Companies-Fund-Expense-Ratio-2

Why does Franklin provide such differential treatment? As a direct investor, I am happy to enjoy the huge difference between regular and direct plans returns in this fund, without bothering about  why. I think regular plan investors should question Franklin about it.

I think regular plan investors should question Franklin about it.

There is a view among the distributor community that regular plans “subsidise” direct plans. Clearly not for all funds and not in all AMCs as the above analysis shows.

Is this difference a really a subsidy or is it used for any other means in regular plans? Would great if someone from Franklin Templeton can clarify.

Please join me in thanking Balaji Swaminathan for this fantastic analysis of direct plan vs regular plan expense ratios.

Want to conduct a sales-free "basics of money management" session in your office?
I conduct free seminars to employees or societies. Only the very basics and getting-started steps are discussed (no scary math):For example: How to define financial goals, how to save tax with a clear goal in mind; How to use a credit card for maximum benefit; When to buy a house; How to start investing; where to invest; how to invest for and after retirement etc. depending on the audience. If you are interested, you can contact me: freefincal [at] Gmail [dot] com. I can do the talk via conferencing software, so there is no cost for your company. If you want me to travel, you need to cover my airfare (I live in Chennai)

Connect with us on social media


Do check out my books


You Can Be Rich Too with Goal-Based InvestingYou can be rich too with goal based investing

My first book is meant to help you ask the right questions, seek the right answers and since it comes with nine online calculators, you can also create customg solutions for your lifestye!Get it now.  It is also available in Kindle format.

Gamechanger: Forget Startups, Join Corporate & Still Live the Rich Life You Want

Gamechanger: Forget Start-ups, Join Corporate and Still Live the Rich Life you want My second book is meant for young earners to get their basics right from day one! It will also help you travel to exotic places at low cost! Get it or gift it to a youngearner

The ultimate guide to travel by Pranav Surya

Travel-Training-Kit-Cover This is a deep dive analysis into vacation planning, finding cheap flights, budget accommodation, what to do when travelling, how travelling slowly is better financially and psychologically with links to the web pages and hand-holding at every step.  Get the pdf for ₹199 (instant download)

Create a "from start to finish" financial plan with this free robo advisory software template


Free Apps for your Android Phone

All calculators from our book, “You can be Rich Too” are now available on Google Play!
Install Financial Freedom App! (Google Play Store)
Install Freefincal Retirement Planner App! (Google Play Store)
Find out if you have enough to say "FU" to your employer (Google Play Store)

About Freefincal

Freefincal has open-source, comprehensive Excel spreadsheets, tools, analysis and unbiased, conflict of interest-free commentary on different aspects of personal finance and investing. If you find the content useful, please consider supporting us by (1) sharing our articles and (2) disabling ad-blockers for our site if you are using one. We do not accept sponsored posts, links or guest posts request from content writers and agencies.

Blog Comment Policy

Your thoughts are vital to the health of this blog and are the driving force behind the analysis and calculators that you see here. We welcome criticism and differing opinions. I will do my very best to respond to all comments asap. Please do not include hyperlinks or email ids in the comment body. Such comments will be moderated and I reserve the right to delete the entire comment or remove the links before approving them.

7 thoughts on “Mutual Fund Expense Ratio: Direct Plan vs Regular Plan

  1. Excellent Article!!.

    SEBI brought in a guidelines stating all MF’s should have only one Plan under heads like ( Large Cap, MID Cap , Small, Tax , Multi Cap ) etc… This is a very appreciable Move!!!!!. Can you throw light on what’s the status on this & what’s the time frame for them to comply with SEBI dictum pl.

  2. Excellent analysis

    Please do this for Sundaram Select Mid Cap fund. There is hardly any difference in TER for Regular and Direct plan.

    Sundaram Mutual Fund AMC seems to be the most “direct investor” unfriendly company

  3. Direct plans of mutual funds have become a big hit due to low charges, but an uber low-cost instrument remains largely undiscovered by investors. The fund management charges of NPS Tier II plans are barely 1% of the cost of the average direct plan. A direct mutual fund charges 0.75-1.5%—or Rs 750-1,500 per year for managing an investment of Rs 1 lakh, compared with Rs 1,500-2,500 charged by a regular mutual fund. But NPS Tier II plans charge only 0.01%—or Rs 10 per year for managing an investment of Rs 1 lakh. The ultra-low costs mean higher returns for investors. Any comments ?

    1. low cost need not mean higher returns as low cost could mean lower salary to fund managers.

  4. Kushroo.. Excellent question.. This got me also thinking too as I never analyzed this AMC or its funds as I don’t have any investments with this fund house.. As a ‘Direct’ customer I would be worried too with regard to so low difference in Expense Ratio when the difference in the ER ratio in FY 2014-15 was significant. As I can’t paste any image on this comment I am sharing a link of my analysis.. Look at it and also read my observations.. Hope this helps

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/0216d7vql16dn6b/Analysis%20of%20Sundaram%20Select%20Midcap.xlsx?dl=0

  5. Thank Balaji Swaminathan for the excellent analysis and thanks to you for presenting it to us.
    Regards

Comments are closed.