Is it possible to time the market?

Last Updated on

Why do people time the market? That is, why do they enter and exit the market based on certain signals (moving averages, PE etc.)? Is it for getting better returns? Or is it for getting risk adjusted returns?

This is a poll I created in Facebook group Asan Ideas for Wealth. As expected, a majority of members believed that timing the market is for getting better returns.

In this post, I would like to answer this question with a digest of a research paper. I am not interested in individual investor experiences either in the US market or in the much younger Indian markets. Relying on those, in my insignificant opinion, is not the ‘scientific’ way to answer the titular questions. I am only interested in studies backed by academic rigour. If you don’t agree, so be it. I can live with that.

I will not consider back-testing results from Indian market history. It is too short to be statistically significant. If you argue, that the Indian market is different from the US market, I can argue, ‘then why is it all trading metrics are derived from backtesting studies of the US market!’.

The academic community is divided in its answer. For every report that says ‘one can time the market’, I can give you a report that says ‘one cannot time the market’.

Naturally AMCs and mutual fund sales are expected to say, stick to you SIPs and do not time. Needless to say, such opinions can rejected straightaway.

It is important for the reader to understand that, even those papers which say  ‘timing works’, only refer to superior risk adjusted return with market timing. Not superior return.

Risk adjusted return is a ratio – return per unit risk and is not the same as return. Crudely, price to earnings (PE) is analogous to risk-adjusted return which is distinctly different from the (stock/index) price.Read more: What is a risk-adjusted return

The most popular timing model paper is by M. T. Faber, “A Quantitative Approach to Tactical Asset Allocation”, Journal of Wealth Management, 9 (4), 69–79. (You can download this paper via above link). Ramesh Mangal tells me that this is is one of the most-downloaded papers from the SSRN network.

Faber uses a 10-month simple moving average (SMA) to time the market. This, for example is one of the simplest strategies he has used.

Monthly price > 10-month SMA –> Buy

Monthly price < 10-month SMA –> Sell and move to cash

When I read his paper, the most striking result was on page 28:

Appendix B breaks down the returns down by decade for the S&P 500 and the timing model. While the timing model outperforms in about half of all decades on an absolute basis, it improves risk-adjusted returns in about two-thirds of all decades and improves drawdown in all but two decades

The timing model improved return for only half the decades from the 1900s. This means, buying-and-holding outperformed the timing model in some decades and vice versa in other decades.

If I start to time the model today, I have no idea whether my strategy will fetch more returns (a common expectation) in the next 10 years. The chances are 50-50, if we go by past performance. As seen in yesterday’s post, “Will long-term equity investing always be successful?“, market dynamics are bound to change with time and past performance is unreliable in more ways than one.

Therefore, my key takeaway from Faber’s paper is, Market timing depends on how the stock market fares in the future (bull/bear/sideways). Since I do not know how it will fare in the future, success is down to luck.

I was looking for a research work to back my thinking. When Prashanth Krishna who runs portfolio yoga tweeted about a new paper on market timing: Revisiting the Profitability of Market Timing with Moving Averages.

When I corresponded with the author of the above paper, Prof. Valeriy Zakamulin, School of Business and Law, University of Agder, Norway, he cited his other work on market timing: A Comprehensive Look at the Empirical Performance of Moving Average Trading Strategies and sent me the original figures for this post!

They considered multiple market timing strategies like simple moving average, exponential moving average, double moving average (like the hurricane warning chart in the Nifty Valuation Analyzer) using the S&P 500  from Jan 1860 to Dec 2014 (155 years, 1860 months!). They divided the data set into two using statistical means.

The dotted lines divides the S&P 500 data set into two with approximately equal number of bull and bear phases
The evolution of the S&P 500 in two two periods. The bear phases are shaded.

Their main conclusions are listed below:

1. There is  strong evidence that the stock market dynamics are changing over time.

In the second half of the data set (panel B) the stock market was less volatile, the stock prices grew with a rate that was more than double as much as that over the first half, and the ratio of the average Bull market length to the average Bear market length was almost double as much as that over the first half.

2. Moving average strategies outperformed the market in the first period (panel A).There is no statistically significant evidence of outperformance in the second period (panel B)

Thereby our findings cast doubts that market timing strategies can consistently beat the market.

3. There is optimal moving average duration. For example,many think that the 200-day DMA is the ‘best’ to use. This cannot be justified.

4. “The outperformance delivered by market timing strategies is highly uneven over time. Most of the outperformance is generated mainly over relatively few particular historical episodes” Results depend crucially on the sample period chosen. Which is why many authors argue in favour of timing.

If one chooses the sample period to be, for instance, either 1900-2010, 1970-2010, or 1990-2010, and simulates, for example, the SMA(10 month) strategy, then one comes to conclusion that market timing works

If the sample period chosen is 25 years after 1970, then market timing fails. If the sample period is post 2000 then market timing wins. The point is, market timing works …sometimes. Since we do not know how the market will fare in future, is it impossible to claim market timing will work for my investment strategy!


If you have reached up to this point, thank you for your patience. There is no statistically rigorous evidence that market timing will work. If wish to enter and exit  following the PE  or moving averages, I strongly suggest you keep better risk adjusted portfolio return and (temporary) capital protection as the goal and not ‘higher returns’.

I am not recommending to time the market. Personally I will not time the market because it does not suit my temperament and I have better things to do.

Do share if you found this useful

About the Author M Pattabiraman author of freefincal.comM. Pattabiraman(PhD) is the author and owner of  He is an associate professor at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras since Aug 2006. Pattu” as he is popularly known, has co-authored two print-books, You can be rich too with goal based investing (CNBC TV18) and Gamechanger and seven other free e-books on various topics of money management.  He is a patron and co-founder of “Fee-only India” an organisation to promote unbiased, commission-free investment advice. Pattu publishes unbiased, promotion-free research, analysis and holistic money management advice. Freefincal serves more than one million readers a year (2.5 million page views) with numbers based analysis on topical issues and has more than a 100 free calculators on different aspects of insurance and investment analysis. He conducts free money management sessions for corporates  and associations(see details below). Previous engagements include World Bank, RBI, BHEL, Asian Paints, TamilNadu Investors Association etc. Contact information: freefincal {at} Gmail {dot} com (sponsored posts or paid collaborations will not be entertained)
Want to conduct a sales-free "basics of money management" session in your office?
I conduct free seminars to employees or societies. Only the very basics and getting-started steps are discussed (no scary math):For example: How to define financial goals, how to save tax with a clear goal in mind; How to use a credit card for maximum benefit; When to buy a house; How to start investing; where to invest; how to invest for and after retirement etc. depending on the audience. If you are interested, you can contact me: freefincal [at] Gmail [dot] com. I can do the talk via conferencing software, so there is no cost for your company. If you want me to travel, you need to cover my airfare (I live in Chennai)

Connect with us on social media

Content Policy

Freefincal has original unbiased, conflict-of-interest-free,  topical reports, reviews, commentary and analysis on all aspects of personal finance like mutual funds, stocks, insurance etc. All guest authors and contributors to the site also do not have any conflict of interest. If you find the content useful, please consider supporting us by (1) sharing our articles and (2) disabling ad-blockers for our site if you are using one. No promotional content We do not accept sponsored posts and link exchange requests from content writers and agencies. This is our privacy policy Our website is non-profit in nature. The revenue from the advertisement will only be used for hosting charges, domain registration charges, specific plugins necessary for traffic growth and analytics services for search engine optimisation.

Do check out my books

You Can Be Rich Too with Goal-Based Investing

You can be rich too with goal based investingMy first book is meant to help you ask the right questions, seek the right answers and since it comes with nine online calculators, you can also create custom solutions for your lifestyle! Get it now.  It is also available in Kindle format.
Gamechanger: Forget Startups, Join Corporate & Still Live the Rich Life You WantGamechanger: Forget Start-ups, Join Corporate and Still Live the Rich Life you wantMy second book is meant for young earners to get their basics right from day one! It will also help you travel to exotic places at low cost! Get it or gift it to a young earner

The ultimate guide to travel by Pranav Surya

Travel-Training-Kit-Cover This is a deep dive analysis into vacation planning, finding cheap flights, budget accommodation, what to do when travelling, how travelling slowly is better financially and psychologically with links to the web pages and hand-holding at every step.  Get the pdf for ₹199 (instant download)

Free Apps for your Android Phone

All calculators from our book, “You can be Rich Too” are now available on Google Play!
Install Financial Freedom App! (Google Play Store)
Install Freefincal Retirement Planner App! (Google Play Store)
Find out if you have enough to say "FU" to your employer (Google Play Store)

Blog Comment Policy

Your thoughts are vital to the health of this blog and are the driving force behind the analysis and calculators that you see here. We welcome criticism and differing opinions. I will do my very best to respond to all comments asap. Please do not include hyperlinks or email ids in the comment body. Such comments will be moderated and I reserve the right to delete the entire comment or remove the links before approving them.


  1. So I don’t time the market when I invest periodically or through SIP. But unless I am investing in Index fund, I *AM* implying that *someone* can time the market (my MF Manager). Indirectly, my investments are timing the market.

    Given that you have concluded in past that Index investing doesn’t work in India because of various reason (poor construction of Index, consistent out performance of an average MF over benchmark, etc.), you do agree that market timing is possible to generate superior returns.

    Do you? Where is my logic wrong?

    1. That index fund does not work in India (so far) is a fact. Whatever the reasons are.
      Timing here refers to the change in asset allocation of a portfolio based on market movements. Not all funds do that and if I invest in such a fund, I am indirectly timing the market, yes. For the record, I don’t.

      1. I am thinking on the same lines. How does active MF work? Assuming they don’t time the market, they have to exit a stock at certain time to book the profit? Right? At the same time, they have to enter the market (buy a stock) when it is lower price? Yes everything is relative and I believe that an active fund manager looks into whole lot of things before buy/sell a stock.
        My question is, if I am paying high % as expense for the MF, isn’t the responsibility of the MF manager to perform (read timing market or whatever). If one would have to time the market based on PE / moving average, why one have to invest in MF? One can invest directly in stocks by looking at the top holdings of the portfolio of one or MF funds?
        Am I missing something here?
        For sure, I am still a pre-kg student on MF itself , forget about direct stock investments. But curious to know.

        1. The basic problem is that equity funds have to invest atleast 65% in equities to be eligible for the equity tag and hence LTCG benefits after 1 year. So the fund manager tries to do his best by staying with the defined limits. You can give him a free hand to rebalance your portfolio as per his wishes by investing in a balanced fund but then you are foregoing the LTCG benefits in that case. Basically speaking, you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

          Balanced funds aren’t without its vices either. It’s not easy even for an expert to know when to enter and exit the stock market. There are several indicators but none of them are perfect. If stay invested for too long in a bull market, you run the risk of huge loss in case of a crash but if you exit early, you can miss out on a rally and your overall returns will suffer. All these factors play a part.

  2. bhagwaan hai, kahi na kahi ……….
    we have to look for HIM
    you are doing a great service to the community who believes in facts than desires
    keep it up, sir

  3. Monthly price > 10-month SMA –> Buy
    Monthly price Sell and move to cash

    Isn’t be other way around? Why buy when monthly price is greater than SMA? Am I missing something?
    Ex: Monthly NAV – Rs 10
    10 month SMA = Rs 9
    As per above, one buys at higher than 10 month SMA?

  4. I use two DMAs, one for 3 months (60 day DMA) and one for 6 months (120 DMA). I never sell, but if the NIFTY is below both these DMA’s, I go overweight in the NIFTY and NIFTY JUNIOR Indices along with PPFAS. If above both, I invest only in Debt Funds. If in between both these DMA’s, I invest in PPFAS only.

    The reason I don’t sell, is because my main aim is to increase the corpus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *